chin dildo said:What do you think of other classic literature?
She's certainly not pretentious - do you actually know what it means?
chin dildo said:An opinion based on stupidity or ignorance though
About 10 years agoDrRingDing said:Calm your inner ginger tiger.
When did you last read Frankenstein?
Even the likes of Jeffrey Archer or Andy McNabb, as terrible as they are, do not come anywhere near being the 'crappest'.Nick Hornby...? What the hell? He's probably the best *easy* read there is!foamy said:i can only think of two authors whose books i've thought are rubbish and they've both been mentioned already:
1) Dan Brown
2) Nick Hornby
i'm going to have to have a think abot number 3.....
Fez909 said:I hate threads like this because people invariably put down authors who they don't particularly care for*, but who aren't the 'crappest' by a country mile. Mary Shelly? Irvine Welsh? Stephen King? Terry Pratchett?Even the likes of Jeffrey Archer or Andy McNabb, as terrible as they are, do not come anywhere near being the 'crappest'.
*And there's always a bit of iconoclasm or posturing of some sort thrown in for good measure (as noted already).
Agree with Dan Brown, but the other two simply suggest that you have had very limited contact with *truly* low quality writing. The same to all those people slagging off Irvine Welsh. I assume that they mean he doesn't live up to the hype, but that isn't the question - if I understand it correctly.Neva said:Chuck Palahniuk
Nick Hornby
Dan Brown

Brainaddict said:Agree with Dan Brown, but the other two simply suggest that you have had very limited contact with *truly* low quality writing. The same to all those people slagging off Irvine Welsh. I assume that they mean he doesn't live up to the hype, but that isn't the question - if I understand it correctly.
Top three just from reading what people have written here:
David Eddings
Dan Brown
Jeffrey Archer
But I'm sure others will come to mind. Actually it seems a bit unfair to target David Eddings particularly out of all the truly appalling fantasy authors but you've got to start somewhere I guess![]()
Brainaddict said:Agree with Dan Brown, but the other two simply suggest that you have had very limited contact with *truly* low quality writing. The same to all those people slagging off Irvine Welsh. I assume that they mean he doesn't live up to the hype, but that isn't the question - if I understand it correctly.
Brainaddict said:. The same to all those people slagging off Irvine Welsh. I assume that they mean he doesn't live up to the hype

Fez909 said:I hate threads like this because people invariably put down authors who they don't particularly care for*, but who aren't the 'crappest' by a country mile. Mary Shelly? Irvine Welsh? Stephen King? Terry Pratchett?Even the likes of Jeffrey Archer or Andy McNabb, as terrible as they are, do not come anywhere near being the 'crappest'.
*And there's always a bit of iconoclasm or posturing of some sort thrown in for good measure (as noted already).
im pretty sure he'd agreechin dildo said:It is awful, isn't it (ecstasy)? I was embarrassed for him reading it
Dubversion said:christ i HATE this shit


Tim Willocks and Tom Clancy?mattie said:I've tried to read Pynchon's 'Gravity's Rainbow' about 5 times, I've got no further than about 50 pages in and given up.
The missus seems to like Mike Gayle. I don't.
For my final choice, there was one I read a while ago about an American prison by some up-and-coming (At the time) British author for which I can't (thankfully) remember any details, but as that's no use to anyone I'll go for that American clown who writes about cold wars going hot and seems to have swallowed a copy of Janes' defence and whose name I can't remember.
Honourable mentions to Kerouac, Crichton and Truss, if she's allowed in here.