Orang Utan
Maybe I like the misery
To his credit, he does have a librarian pongoid in his books. That's the only thing to his credit mind
Dubversion said:Pratchett is an over-rated unfunny hack who should have his arms cut off lest he writes another 700 volumes of his wacky shite
Your hatred of the beardy one is well known Dub. We'll have to agree to differ on this one. He's over-rated yes, but I still think his take on social satire is worth a read. Granted he's no Swift but the two I already mentioned are worth the time and the costt of the book
Bazza said:Of all Welsh's novels, I'd have said that Filth is the worst.
I can't think of top three worst, if I don't like them, I don't read.
I can think of one though, Tony Parsons. He only seems to write about single parent families.
Also, I am going to mention Nick Hornby simply for writing a book about Arsenal! (I know he's a good writer really)

SpookyFrank said:Dostoevsky, Camus and Kafka.
Why don't you just write in english you pretentious cunts, nobody's impressed![]()
SpookyFrank said:Dostoevsky, Camus and Kafka.
Why don't you just write in english you pretentious cunts, nobody's impressed![]()

pyrovitae said:maybe because english is not their first language and their novels are 'lost in translation'? i guess i'm a pretentious cunt because i've enjoyed works by all of them.
pyrovitae said:thanks too for the completely unprovoked attack and personal assumptions on the basis of a solitary post.
Belushi said:Frankenstein is fucking ace.
jbob said:S
J.R.R Tolkein - take your orks, whelks, and whathaveyou elsewhere, hobbitbotherer.
You've missed the point then - of course Mary Shelley's books are full of frightful snobbery, so are Jane Austen's and much 19th/18th century literature - that doesn't invalidate its validity as literature.DrRingDing said:It's a pile of steaming wank.
The class snobbery in it is fucking sickening.
chin dildo said:You've missed the point then - of course Mary Shelley's books are full of frightful snobbery, so are Jane Austen's and much 19th/18th century literature - that doesn't invalidate its validity as literature.
chin dildo said:You've missed the point then - of course Mary Shelley's books are full of frightful snobbery, so are Jane Austen's and much 19th/18th century literature - that doesn't invalidate its validity as literature.

Dubversion said:it's like accusing some 8th century Italian playwright of not being sufficiently anti-imperalist or something![]()

It's a dying art - belushi can tell if there's going to be a drought or a delugeDubversion said:I've never read donkeys![]()
