dirtysanta
Original Casual
trashpony said:You're so honest. I decided not to mention my less than glorious back catalogue![]()
![]()
im just waiting for urban safety party to turn up giving me
and
....blah blah.trashpony said:You're so honest. I decided not to mention my less than glorious back catalogue![]()
![]()
and
....blah blah.Wouldn't have though the previously clean licence made a huge amount of difference to be honest - wouldn't have done with me. Main issues would be (a) the actual danger / inconvenience caused (inc. any awareness of a particular local problem); (b) your attitude; (c) what else they had to dopogofish said:I'd guess that here, having an already clean licence may have helped?
For speeding, there is a requirement that the registered keeper is sent a Notice of Intended Prosecution within 14 days, so the system kicks in pretty quickly. If the vehicle is registered to your address then you would receive something within a caouple of weeks if it were to be progressed (barring the postman losing it, of course). (By the way, registering at a false address would not avail you of this technicality - the law defines service as posting to the last known registered keeper's address).Random One said:it's clean at the moment...although i thought i got flashed about a month ago but still not received any fine, so im thinking im still good
dirtysanta said:im just waiting for urban safety party to turn up giving meand
....blah blah.



dirtysanta said:What was ?


in 2002, so that should be deleted soon, is it 4 years?
so in a few weeks there'll be another 3 points

detective-boy said:Wouldn't have though the previously clean licence made a huge amount of difference to be honest
The deciding factor seemed to be that they all had a string of endorsements although I'll conceed that attitude/location may well have played its part. 
trashpony said:That was me when I first joined urban, giving you a hard time about your poor driving. You hated me for ages. Then we made up. I don't remember how
Sorry![]()

The points only count for "totting-up" purposes (i.e. adding up to 12 means a disualification) for three years from conviction date.marty21 said:3 points for doing 43 in a 30in 2002, so that should be deleted soon, is it 4 years?
dirtysanta said:I glad we made up though.![]()



detective-boy said:The points only count for "totting-up" purposes (i.e. adding up to 12 means a disualification) for three years from conviction date.
The endorsement (i.e. the record of the conviction) lasts for four years from the date of offence for most offences; for four years from the date of conviction for dangerous driving and things which led to disqualification and for eleven years from conviction for drink driving and causing death by careless / reckless driving offences.
And beware of motorway roadworks by the way. You can almost GUARANTEE that there will be speed enforcement if it is advertised. This may be by bright yellow GATSO cameras and/or time and distance monitoring based on ANPR equipped video cameras (again yellow and obvious) at the start and finish of the roadworks and/or covert video camera and other technology (the bright yellow bit is only needed if the money raised is to be given back to the agency employing the cameras, covert enforcement is still quite legal but fines, etc. go to central Treasury funds) and/or police mobile enforcement (e.g. laser based speed equipment used from bridges or alongside the motorway and/or uniformed police patrols in marked and/or unmarked cars.
It really amazes me to see the twats who sail along at 69mph in the second lane (or even offside) of an empty motorway (and who no doubt think they are holier than thou) continue at exactly the same speed through the temporary 50mph limit. Did they just not see it?
so it's all my fault
None since. You're probably right. I know my concentration is far better when I am travelling faster (on two or four wheels) and thats even without the constant distraction of checking speedometer.2 Hardcore said:(And I'm convinced that regular paranoia-induced checking of my speed is making me a poorer driver)

But the cameras don't discriminate on grounds of gender....... more's the pityStobart Stopper said:Nil points. That's becasue I am a woman though isn't it?![]()

I am only joking. Some of the worst driving I have ever seen is around here in Redbridge.......school run neurotic mothers in huge 4x4's, nails so long they can hardly drive..they tailgate, have kids in there who are not strapped in.........smoke like chimneys while talking on their mobiles. Fucking twats.2 Hardcore said:But the cameras don't discriminate on grounds of gender....... more's the pity![]()
detective-boy said:And beware of motorway roadworks by the way. You can almost GUARANTEE that there will be speed enforcement if it is advertised. This may be by bright yellow GATSO cameras and/or time and distance monitoring based on ANPR equipped video cameras (again yellow and obvious) at the start and finish of the roadworks and/or covert video camera and other technology (the bright yellow bit is only needed if the money raised is to be given back to the agency employing the cameras, covert enforcement is still quite legal but fines, etc. go to central Treasury funds) and/or police mobile enforcement (e.g. laser based speed equipment used from bridges or alongside the motorway and/or uniformed police patrols in marked and/or unmarked cars.
s'ok - me tooStobart Stopper said:I am only joking. .

moose said:My licence is kind of grubby, cos it's the old style foldy paper one and has never been sent away.![]()
pogofish said:Yup, what is the position with licences today? I still have my old green one & as I hate being photographed, I'd like to keep it as long as possible but I thought I read something that suggests they may become invalid soon. Nowt yet from the DVLA tho.

