SpookyFrank
Don't swallow the cap
Series three just pips series two for me.
Call 'em what you like, it's just one opinion.I meant S1, S2, S3, S4 or S5, since LC is so reluctant to call them seasons
Call 'em what you like, it's just one opinion.
What's your favourite section/segment/chapter/bit so far then?
I'm not sure.
All have some excellent moments. The end of S3 was monumental. Season 4, however, probably inches ahead. It was pure brilliance.
Season 5 is good good good so far, I'm only 3 eps in though.
I did miss one ep of season 4 because Dillinger4 is made of fail![]()

The new season is shaping up very nicely, but other than that Season 4 is my favourite. I really enjoyed the school/education angle and I liked the kids - I miss Namond and Randy now they haven't come back in Season 5.
Oi! Can the spoilers please, I know many of us are waiting to watch series 5 all in one...
oooo I have seen episode 4 of season 5
![]()

Are't these sequels. By which I mean they were conceived after the completion of the first, the first having been conceived and created as a distinct, whole entity.But it would not be so strange to argue that Henry IV Part One is superior to Part Two, or that The Empire Strikes Back is better than Return of the Jedi.
Are't these sequels. By which I mean they were conceived after the completion of the first, the first having been conceived and created as a distinct, whole entity.
Tbh, does it matter . . . there isn't a definitive answer as it's surely a matter of personal interpretaion?

really?Okay, but tell me this, which ‘chapter’ best depicts the changing urban American landscape and then which addresses the causes of that change. Which portrays the futility of central Gov's drug policy best, which examines best how institutions compromise and diminish individuals?
You might even be able to choose, but does it get us anywhere or does that diminish the whole i.e. over arching themes – as well as many character arcs – don’t fit the conveniently parcelled slices made by the OP. For those themes and arcs, the seasonal slicing is arbitrary, and even a distraction.
But the series-approach, as we must come to know it, does enable discussions such as 'In Which Series is Omar Most Cool?'Okay, but tell me this, which ‘chapter’ best depicts the changing urban American landscape and then which addresses the causes of that change. Which portrays the futility of central Gov's drug policy best, which examines best how institutions compromise and diminish individuals?
You might even be able to choose, but does it get us anywhere or does that diminish the whole i.e. over arching themes – as well as many character arcs – don’t fit the conveniently parcelled slices made by the OP. For those themes and arcs, the seasonal slicing is arbitrary, and even a distraction.
![]()
(I'm dl-ing it now though)
Yus. Fwiw, I think if David Simon could change one thing about The Wire it would be to keep Omar as an occasional low-level bit part.But the series-approach, as we must come to know it, does enable discussions such as 'In Which Series is Omar Most Cool?'
So your favourite's the second season then?Yus. Fwiw, I think if David Simon could change one thing about The Wire it would be to keep Omar as an occasional low-level bit part.
Another option; those seasonal stories (that the OP is implicitly focused on) are no more than elaborate plot devises intended only to feed the greater cause/s, but which act to the writes credit in that they can be (and are) viewed as whole themselves.
Having said all that, I do seem to find Frank Sobotka haunting.
L_C, I know your feelings about calling it a cop show, but I think that to look at it as only a profound and searching work of political critique is wrong. It is also a highly entertaining cop show/drama, with jokes and heroes and villains, albeit subtly portrayed ones. It is compelling in part because it has dramatic storylines and episodic plots that are resolved at the end of a series. One of the astounding achievements of the Wire is that it manages to combine the what-happens-next urgency and omg-that-was-so-cool moments with a strong commitment to realism and a consistent philosophical outlook without turning into a po-faced, 'serious' work of art as if Mike Leigh had made a murder mystery.

Go forth, my child, and spread my words of peace. By force, if necessary.You are so wise
You've hit the nail on the head.
Go forth, my child, and spread my words of peace. By force, if necessary.
(a) I (hope) I'm not precious about it and (b) the reason it’s so good is exactly as you say, it does work multi-dimensionally across a wide range of themes, some narrow in scope some huge.L_C, I know your feelings about calling it a cop show, but I think that to look at it as only a profound and searching work of political critique is wrong. It is also a highly entertaining cop show/drama, with jokes and heroes and villains, albeit subtly portrayed ones.

(a) I (hope) I'm not precious about it and (b) the reason it’s so good is exactly as you say, it does work multi-dimensionally across a wide range of themes, some narrow in scope some huge.
My main point though is that to consider it a ‘cop show’ - in the same simplistic sense that it’s popular to characterise (using a recent release) the Coen Bros. latest film as a ‘chase movie’ - is so narrow and naive as to mischaracterise the work entirely. It’s not like Occams Razor, it’s dumbing down or, worst still, trendy over-simplification born of 30-word Time Out summaries and glib, sound-bite aware ‘entertainment reporters’.
Besides that, I think the writers deserve more credit.
Mr Tang . . . . leave my nuts alone, I'm building up a head of steam for the weekend![]()
You should find an additional voiceover track on the first episode (at least) - obviously go with convention but do watch it again with the second track for some insight into the sensibilities they're after.I have just bought series one from Amazon, so that I can feel part of the gang. Can you all please stop discussing it until I'm up to speed?