Yesterdays Love Music Hate Racism demo

[durruti02]

I've started to get back involved in community work after a gap. Sometimes continual defeats take it out on you .

I defend the rightness of voting Tory if it removes something worse than a Tory though.

When I was talking about a lack of alternatives there are I agree alternatives in the form of community action but when you are in an area or a situation where it is needed to remove a piss poor encumbent quickly and effectively then voting Tory may sometimes be the best way.

sorry but this is also absurd

yes continual defeats do take it out of you .. but whether with your own live, your families etc etc etc there is NO choice but to carry on regardless of defeats and set backs ..

and really there is something worse than a Tory! incredible really incredible .. yes ken was a wanker but worse than a Tory??? no this is daft .. as i said have you seen Boris's team?????

i do not see how replacing NL with Tory, Ken with Boris, etc makes things better .. yes you are right it is at the community level we must build .. and that alone at this stage is sadly all we can do

 

[durruti02]

Is it any different from the scum that Livingstone surrounded himself with. Still scum but with a different label.

yes very differrent .. the scum KL had were corrupt pocket lining parasites .. the scum that boris has surrounded himself with are nasty are nasty extreme pro neo liberal scum .. a totally differrent level of scumminess

 

[brasicritique]

yes very differrent .. the scum KL had were corrupt pocket lining parasites .. the scum that boris has surrounded himself with are nasty are nasty extreme pro neo liberal scum .. a totally differrent level of scumminess

i dont know i think if there is a difference then it is so obscure as to be irrelevent in this sense if you examine kens policies 'for londoners' you will actually see that he did not do much and his main aim was 'attratting buissness to the capital' ( translated as money for the citybanks) and hid the fact he was in thrall to corperate interest whereas boris is incapable of hiding a cigerete box let alone being in thrall to corperate interests.

 

[poster342002]

Re: the Ken V Boris - which is worse? thing.

I think what really rankles is that Ken was able to get away with stuff that Boris probably wouldn't becuase Ken had "left cover" and excuses made for him by those who'd scream the place down were a tory doing them.

 

[brasicritique]

Re: the Ken V Boris - which is worse? thing.

I think what really rankles is that Ken was able to get away with stuff that Boris probably wouldn't becuase Ken had "left cover" and excuses made for him by those who'd scream the place down were a tory doing them.

yep

 

[dennisr]

yep

... but so what?

does that give ejets an excuse to vote for boris?

(because that is what this thread has become in the minds of some - an 'excuse me' for voting tory)

 

[brasicritique]

... but so what?

does that give ejets an excuse to vote for boris?

(because that is what this thread has become in the minds of some - an 'excuse me' for voting tory)

you have obviously decoded my subliminal vote boris messages in my posts. I have never said 'vote boris' or 'use this as an excuse to vote boris' what are you talking about and if you are so sure about being able to read 'the minds of some' then call a poll on your idea

boris or ken same shit differnt day