I read an article the other day that compared the 2 machines 3 times, once when the PS3 first came out, once a year later and one now.
after reading all 3 articles I wanted the author to commit and say which console was better.
He didn't/couldn't.
you can't really...
It's like saying which is better a porsche or a ferrari ... it boils down to personal taste over all the ps3 - thin which will be launched in the next 2 years will bring the cost down imeasureably and as a result will make it a direct competitor to the 360 (at which poitn i expect ms to rush out a 720 or some such with similar build problems but still with a modern version of XBL)
thing that MS has done over sony and what sony still don't get yet is that MS aren't really selling a console they are selling an cut down Operating system in the form of XBL. it's this familarity which will proably ultimately win over people even if it's a bit MS in some of it's functions (and you have to pay to go online and game and all the other shite credits instead of cash amounts on your account etc...) and once the next gen of younger gamers are preconditioned into the MS/XBL way of doing things this is what will stick much like people get currently conditioned into the windows way of doing things. and unlike most people the console market has changed from it being rich kids with new toys or spoddy techies with mech fanstaies to be almost the 3rd essential electrical component after the tv and the dvd player... so the cutlure has massively changed as a result the gaming public at large don't want to learn new ways of doing things and are happy by and large with fancy new icons every so often rather than improvd functionality or a dev's wish list of features.
To a certain extent this has been helped along with the sucess of the wii and really it reenforces the change in gaming from the publics POV.
however i guess we might be at the peak here for gaming in terms of hard ware for a bit as the current economic crisis has hit the gaming world hard with even EA making losses and smaller firms shutting up shop left right and centre so there maybe no need for a tech expansion for some time (and as japans economy is tanking it there might not be one again as the only company to make money ont heir consoles is nintendo who are always reluctant to release new products if the old ones are still selling/making money...)
so i guess this current crisis int he economy if it continues for two long might overly reduce the hardware expansion making the only saleable features the online component which of course will only be of benefit to both systems as it'll lead to a 'live enviroment' arms race which cold be very intresting...
however to go back to the original point they aren't the same it's not possible to pick one and say this is better, neither ofhtem are perfect both have issues...
I'd dispute filters they have a bigger back catoglouge now though this might have been true intially (although MS included all previous xb games as well as the launch titles for the 360 and a hell of a lot of ported ps2 games as their launch range) it certainly isn't now true and as i've said before the jump off will come when dev's decide fuck it were not making a reduced game because we can only limit the data to a single layer dvd format...
MS see it as an Os sale basically, sony as an advertising horading for other sony brand (or approved brand) products one you pay for your online gaming the other is sponsored in the hope of enticing you to buy more stuff is the main difference...
who get's to the convergance of both quickest (currently as i said looking like XBL) will be the one who ultimately wins the console war.
home however will introduce a second life type avatar system which will entice a lot of people on to it (look how popular the wii mii's were and frankly their limtied scope is a touch shite...)