I've been looking after a pure Boxer dog for a while, her owner is away. She's about two years old, and quite lovely. Gonna miss her - she goes back today.
Before looking after her was not so into pedigrees. She cost £500 - and I have to say she's worth every penny. She's very sound and not at all highly-strung, as pedigrees seem to have a propensity to being.
Prior to meeting this dog, I was always in favour of mongrels and crosses. My experience says they tend to be brighter, healthier, easier to train.
However, this animal has changed my view - she's great fun and so full of character. (Also sooo much energy, but then that is what Boxer's are renowned for).
So I'd definitely pay for a Boxer. I would also buy a Wolfhound, as they are also wonderful dogs.
Saying that,my last own dog was a fabulous friend, a wolfhound/lurcher cross on one side, and every dog in Hackney on the other. She was the bee's-knees. But the Boxer has taken a near second place in my affection.
I'd willingly take in a greyhound; happily home a mongrel, and dig into my pocket for a Boxer or Wolfhound. I'm not so hot on little dogs, they can be great friends, but I like the somewhat bigger presence of a larger animal (that sounds a little tautological, I mean something other than size).
For me, the thing really is, wherever the dog comes from, I prefer bitches (cleaner, easier to train, fewer leader of the pack problems, often smarter); mongrels (hardier, smarter, more balanced personality more often than not) and do like to take the runt of the litter (smarter, though often smaller and can be a little illness-prone at first - but always smarter, as they had to struggle harder for food).
But dogs are great. Thinking of fostering them for a bit, you know, looking after them between homes.
I <Insert Heart Emoticon here> Dogs.