Never mind the sewing room, I long for permanently available cutting space. Not gonna happen, though.Yes, as madamv can confirm, after much sanding of floors, and unpacking of ridiculous amounts of 'stuff', I now have a sewing room again.

Never mind the sewing room, I long for permanently available cutting space. Not gonna happen, though.Yes, as madamv can confirm, after much sanding of floors, and unpacking of ridiculous amounts of 'stuff', I now have a sewing room again.

Thanks for the warning - having googled reviews of it, and having seen photos of it, there's certainly a fitting problem between the bust and waist. The pattern's envelope shows the original 1950's proportions, but the actual pattern's been redone for current proportions and less corsetry.Just caught up with it... I do like that dress. Everyone in blogland was making it a few years ago and I've refrained but actually it's lovely. I seem to remember in fact that there was a common problem with it, I'm not sure what. <snip>


Somewhere, I've got a leather-suitable vogue pattern for a not-quite microskirt with a slit a few inches up the front of one thigh... and the sueded pleather for it.Having just caught up, I'm now wondering whether I should make myself some leather trousers for the motorbike, and turn my wetsuit into a dress...![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't think any of the last 3 dresses were that good, the whole avant garde thing seemed to throw them. Based on the whole series I think Neil should have won but his last 2 creations were a nightmareMatt's a nice lad but surprised that he won, especially with that hula hoop, haute coutre, thing. Felt he shoulda been third, if the rest of the competition was a factor. For me, objectively, it shoulda been Lorna. (Despite knowing Neil's wife since childhood)
As for the skanklet, let's not go there.Aye, didnt think much of the final dresses. The one with the hula hoop was a bit, aye right mate.
I succumbed to buying the pattern as I found a half price off all patterns sale, but having googled imaged it, it looks rubbish on almost everyone. I've read somewhere that there is a version in the GBSB book, and that they've updated it for a better fitThanks for the warning - having googled reviews of it, and having seen photos of it, there's certainly a fitting problem between the bust and waist. The pattern's envelope shows the original 1950's proportions, but the actual pattern's been redone for current proportions and less corsetry.
One of the websites advises choosing the pattern size by upper bust (not full bust) and then adjusting downwards from there. Just as well there aren't many pieces, this might require a toile, or at least a ruinable version and then one made in better cloth.
http://www.edelweisspatterns.com/blog/?p=552
Also, in spite of the pattern envelope showing contrasting binding, it seems from comments that making it with all the binding turned inwards would be more authentic for the 50s and give a more professional finish. So here's a link for how to do that, in case I forget by the time the bits are cut.
http://seamstresserin.com/how-to-invisiblybias-tape-arm-holes/

I think they got confused about what the competition was about. There's a difference been being a seamstress/dressmaker/tailor l and a fashion designer. Patrick's a Saville Row tailor. I wouldn't expect him to whip up an avant garde dressI succumbed to buying the pattern as I found a half price off all patterns sale, but having googled imaged it, it looks rubbish on almost everyone. I've read somewhere that there is a version in the GBSB book, and that they've updated it for a better fit
I enjoyed that series but the last episode was the weakest really. I think the avant garde dress challenge was a bit too hard or something. Too much pattern cutting.
Exactly. I think what may have happened is similar to what happened with "Dancing on Ice": The first series kept close to the essence of the original idea, but subsequent series drifted as the producers tried to bring in more and more weird and wacky stuff in the hope of keeping audience figures high.I think they got confused about what the competition was about. There's a difference been being a seamstress/dressmaker/tailor l and a fashion designer. <snip>
I also think the alteration challenges are a bit odd too. I don't know anyone in real life who takes a dress and turns it into a pair of child's dungarees and again there's a lot of pattern cutting in that. That's a whole other skill. I tried to learn it ages ago and basically gave up because I produced so many unwearable and strange things.I think they got confused about what the competition was about. There's a difference been being a seamstress/dressmaker/tailor l and a fashion designer. Patrick's a Saville Row tailor. I wouldn't expect him to whip up an avant garde dress
That used to be a thing in the 1960s and 70s, but you'd buy a pattern and just treat the old garment like a remnant (after unpicking most of the seams).I also think the alteration challenges are a bit odd too. I don't know anyone in real life who takes a dress and turns it into a pair of child's dungarees and again there's a lot of pattern cutting in that. <snip>
This also only works if you're sewing for someone smaller than the original garment size.That used to be a thing in the 1960s and 70s, but you'd buy a pattern and just treat the old garment like a remnant (after unpicking most of the seams).
A lot smaller at that. Probably the most common one was a skirt made from an adult's dress with a cigarette burn - plenty of fabric for a skinny child and no need to use the damaged bit.This also only works if you're sewing for someone smaller than the original garment size.


I suppose it depends if you want it in a colour or finish which you can't easily get.Wow. Who has the patience to sew a bra?