Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

worst newspaper

Where have all the tabloid robots gone, the ones that beleive Diana's death was an accident? It all seems to be getting sensible on here?
 
Where have all the tabloid robots gone, the ones that beleive Diana's death was an accident? It all seems to be getting sensible on here?

because people believe it was an accident, they are robots? - one could argue that those that believe she was assassinated are conspiraloons
 
because people believe it was an accident, they are robots? - one could argue that those that believe she was assassinated are conspiraloons


Does it not seem fishy that all the tabloids rushed to brand anyone who found it suspicious as "loons" or were they acting on orders higher up?
 
Does it not seem fishy that all the tabloids rushed to brand anyone who found it suspicious as "loons" or were they acting on orders higher up?

do you not think those same tabloids would pay a fortune for an exclusive that proved she was murdered, and that it would be impossible for such proof to remain secret
 
...

But not?

The Graun is a pretty good read by the by. The only remaining paper left on the National Market (minus FT) which still bears a semblence of intelligent discussion and analysis. Worse since it went Berliner, I'll grant, and obviously still flawed politically (disgraceful manouvrings on the Iraq war should never be forgotten) but definitely the best national paper in this country by far.
 
...

But not?

The Graun is a pretty good read by the by. The only remaining paper left on the National Market (minus FT) which still bears a semblence of intelligent discussion and analysis. Worse since it went Berliner, I'll grant, and obviously still flawed politically (disgraceful manouvrings on the Iraq war should never be forgotten) but definitely the best national paper in this country by far.

The financial times is quite possibly the dullest paper in the UK. :)
 
...

But not?

The Graun is a pretty good read by the by. The only remaining paper left on the National Market (minus FT) which still bears a semblence of intelligent discussion and analysis. Worse since it went Berliner, I'll grant, and obviously still flawed politically (disgraceful manouvrings on the Iraq war should never be forgotten) but definitely the best national paper in this country by far.

I think it's liberal dishonesty/hypocrisy is what makes it 'the worst' (a term in itself loaded with our own personal likes/dislikes) imho.
It's shite for sport, woeful for politics which imho makes it as bad as it gets. FFS the Daily Mirror had and still has a better view on Iraq than the apparently progressive Guardian. Why Kevin Maguire left the Mirror for the Guardian and then went back is worth a read I reckon.
 
I agree with Fed. I read the Guardian (I read all the dailies, not all of them every day, but each on a regular basis), but like all papers it should be read with the knowledge of where it is coming from. This has been discussed recently in a thread in general.
 
do you not think those same tabloids would pay a fortune for an exclusive that proved she was murdered, and that it would be impossible for such proof to remain secret

Not if THEY were next! And who can blame em? Look what happened to David Kelly for embarrassing the Govt....
 
Socialist Worker has to be the most dire waste of newsprint in the land and its touts are all so scruffy - they make Big Issue sellers look positively well groomed.
 
...

But not?

The Graun is a pretty good read by the by. The only remaining paper left on the National Market (minus FT) which still bears a semblence of intelligent discussion and analysis. Worse since it went Berliner, I'll grant, and obviously still flawed politically (disgraceful manouvrings on the Iraq war should never be forgotten) but definitely the best national paper in this country by far.

When push comes to shove on issues like Iraq, the Guardian will always back the Government of the day, despite the fact that right up until the crucial moment it appears to be backing the other side. It has a history of employing spook journalists, whether knowingly or unknowingly, and should NEVER be trusted.
 
When push comes to shove on issues like Iraq, the Guardian will always back the Government of the day, despite the fact that right up until the crucial moment it appears to be backing the other side. It has a history of employing spook journalists, whether knowingly or unknowingly, and should NEVER be trusted.

I can't remember which book i read it in but apparently every single newspaper has spooks in the hughest echelons and woe betide any editor that doesn't play ball
 
...and oddly enough i have very similar views to most of those who have a go at me on here....bizarre!
ie not many of those i argue with turn round and admit to be Tory bastards
 
Please guyz, don't confuse me believing what the Guardian says and thinking it's the best national newspaper together - I know how to approach any information being ceded through establishment media outlets, I also know the Guardian is not the worst by far.
 
Does it not seem fishy that all the tabloids rushed to brand anyone who found it suspicious as "loons" or were they acting on orders higher up?
Don't forget to leave some flowers and have a good cry in public on the anniversary of her death.
 
Back
Top Bottom