Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Workplace struggle

Louis MacNeice said:
And I bet 'Lucy Parsons' agrees with you 100% on this.:D

Louis Macneice

:D:D:D

Mind you, I can't imagine Libcom protesting against the extra publicity on urban :D
 
Existential Question

butchersapron said:
...you keep impersonating people. Including, rather shamefully...yourself

Is it possible for an individual to impersonate themselves?

Fair play to Attica if he pulled that one off!
 
There's one problem with this thread, it's not an actual Libcom position rather it's by a poster called Redtwister on Libcom. I agree with much of it, disagree with others and I'm sure the same can be said for most folk on libcom or in the libcom collective, fuck knows why Attica is trying to paint this as an agreed libcom position?

I'd imagine it's cause he's a mentalist.
 
butchersapron said:
it's not for your 'politics' but because you keep impersonating people. Including, rather shamefully...yourself, in an attempt to get an article of yours into their library, a library that you started at least two threads slagging off. Don't keep doing this to yourself.

Why was I on libcom for months recently and they knew, and then I got banned again in the middle of a political dispute? It's political and you know it:D

Likewise I do not 'keep impersonating people' - that is your hyperbole, I never have impersonated anybody.... As for that article I am not that bothered, as you know I regard limpcok with disdain, I put it on to see what would happen. They banned me again - it's political. Doing what to myself? having a go at the shite politics of others - they're fair game:p :D
 
Attica said:
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: FFS - I looked at that article and nowhere did I spot that it was by Red Twister - there was no name when I looked so I thought it was from Limpcok.

please provide the link, i'm pretty certain it's obvious it isn't an agreed 'libcom' position, it's a fecking website and forum ffs!
 
Attica said:
There's loads of them...:D

At the rate you're going, you'll end up posting this sort of petty shite on s*ormfront and revelling in the applause for your valiant struggle against the rubbish Left!
 
Attica said:
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: FFS - I looked at that article and nowhere did I spot that it was by Red Twister - there was no name when I looked so I thought it was from Limpcok.
in that case fair enough, genuine mistake.
(whys and wherefores of t'banning being nowt to do wi me)
 
On the unlikely chance that anybody gives a shit. The quotes in the OP come from a post in this thread, by somebody who occaisionally posts on the forums and later edited in a comment to say that he doesn't entirely agree with all of it any more:

Not quite the "libcom position", is it?
 
In Bloom said:
On the unlikely chance that anybody gives a shit. The quotes in the OP come from a post in this thread, by somebody who occaisionally posts on the forums and later edited in a comment to say that he doesn't entirely agree with all of it any more:

Not quite the "libcom position", is it?

I didn't get it from there.

It was a featured article on the site the other day in its own right and I didn't keep a link to it (cos I never anticipated it would be important). You advertise articles on the site in a sort of little taster way. I've pointed out other flaws in your ultra left library before:)

I've just been on Limpcok and found the article link for you - http://libcom.org/library/nefac-workplace-position-critique-wright

AS you can still see the author is not identified.

Actually I am a trifle embarressed as I had not read the article correctly - in my haste to critique I misinterpreted/forgot the bit where he said "common to most working class organisations" which IS the right thing to say...
 
1) It's tagged Chris Wright. Does that by any chance give you a little clue as to who the author might be?
2) What's all this "you" stuff?
 
Back
Top Bottom