In Bloom said:
I think that you're missing the point. The institutions that working class people set up and fought for have been coopted, they're part of the establishment now. Just look at trade union bureaucracy for an example. Without these institutions under our control, we're pretty much back to square one, albiet a more comfortable square one without the cholera.
Then do it again. The need is quite clearly there, the options are clear - either clear out the coopted unions and strip out their bureaucracies or start from scratch again.
I don't think I'm missing the point - if things are so bad where is the new workers movement? The point, quite clearly is nothing to do with whether or not the w/c are 'clever' enough for political power, it's whether or not they can be
bothered to go through the same process of self-improvement as their Victorian forebears.
There are a billion and one 'reasons' why there isn't a new w/c movement - long hours for those who work, an education system that 'fails' the w/c, a mass consumer environment, TV...this opposed to cholera, typhoid, NO schools, no housing whatsoever and all the other privations the Victorian W/C had to deal with...not really a competition is it?
Call centre worker £25K! Since when and where?
Well one of my flatmates will be clearing £25K this year - he works for one of the banks flogging insurance and loan policies so this includes his bonus.
But my point is even
more valid when talking about CC workers who earn even less - this is the new w/c and where the next TU movement will come from (same goes for all those poles currently 'stealing our jobs') and it's up to the left to
make itself an attractive proposition again. And yet how many of thems see themselves as the same 'working class' as their parents and grandparents? How many in the modern left see them as the spiritual heirs to the cotton mill and mineworkers and steelworkers and are engaging them as such?