Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Words that baffle the amateur cook

Making cocktails I was told to 'muddle the raspberries', how the fuck is a normal person meant to know that muddling means to gently squash them :rolleyes:
 
These are all very good and I've made a start. But it's actually surprisingly hard to explain clearly in not-encyclodpaedia-language what some of these terms mean. I think I'm going to have to do more research.
 
Okay, here are a couple of the ones I've done so far. bear in mind that I am not looking for the Ultimate Definition, just a clear, simple guide to what I mean when I use these terms.

Reduce
Reducing a liquid means just what it sounds like – making what there is smaller. You do this by simmering or boiling the liquid so that the water evaporates. This concentrates the liquid so it has more flavour. It’s not an exact science, so if a recipe says “reduce by half”, you simply simmer or boil it until you think there is half as much liquid as there was in the beginning.

When making stock, it can be useful to reduce the liquid right down if you’re not going to use it straight away because it saves room in your fridge or freezer. When you want to use the stock you can then add water to bring it up to its former concentration. For example, if you’ve made 500ml of nice stock and then reduced it by half so that it’s 250ml, when you want to use it you add 250ml of water to restore it to the right concentration.

Al dente
This means, literally, “To the teeth”. What it means in practice is that when you bite into it, it should still be slightly firm. For example, when cooking pasta, the pasta should still be slightly undercooked in the centre and should provide some resistance when you bite it. When pasta is overcooked it is soft all the way through and feels a bit soggy.

Blanching Tomatoes
To blanche tomatoes, you immerse them in boiling (or just-boiled) water for a short period (only about 15 seconds) and then immediately pop them into some cold water to stop the tomatoes cooking any further. You can then peel off the skin much easier.

What do you think?
 
Sauteeing's all about moving the pan a lot isn't it. Hence sautee pans tend to have higher sides than your average frying pan, allowing you to swash the food about a little more. Frying's more static in my book - things stay in the same position in the pan and are typically turned over only occasionally.
 
trashpony said:
It's an american measurement. Can't remember how much it is though but it's easy to google.


*installs computer in kitchen*

it always takes me by surprise. right there in the middle of cooking summit it will say "add two cups of..." and then revert back to real measurements
 
trashpony said:
It's an american measurement. Can't remember how much it is though but it's easy to google.
What's confusing is that it is a measurement of volume rather than weight
 
the cup is a standard American measurement, as trashpony says.

But in some recipes, where things are in proportion to each other, the size of the cup doesn't matter at all.

So there's a recipe for a cake that goes something like "3 cups of flour, 2 cups of sugar, 1 cup of shortening". I'm not a baker so I don't know if my memory of this recipe is accurate. But the point is that since all the measurments are in cups, you can use any sized cup, so long as you use the same one the whole time.

Another confusing this is that, since a cup of something is the volume of the thing, powders (like flour) and fluids (like milk) and shortenings (like butter) all come out at different weights.

Google is your friend....


ETA as Orang Utan already said, while I was waffling away
 
Pingu said:
*installs computer in kitchen*

it always takes me by surprise. right there in the middle of cooking summit it will say "add two cups of..." and then revert back to real measurements

Image018.jpg




(that's a PC in a toaster btw)
 
story said:
So there's a recipe for a cake that goes something like "3 cups of flour, 2 cups of sugar, 1 cup of shortening". I'm not a baker so I don't know if my memory of this recipe is accurate. But the point is that since all the measurments are in cups, you can use any sized cup, so long as you use the same one the whole time.
That's alright when your used to it but when you want to make a birthday cake and use espresso cups you end up with enough mixture to make a fairy cake. :)
 
Orang Utan said:
What's confusing is that it is a measurement of volume rather than weight

Yes, it's very annoying. I have some cups in my drawer which I don't use that often but they're handy.

The problem with the 'use the same cup rather than A Cup' approach is that if you're making cakes, then eggs are involved. And they're done by number, not cup ;)
 
tarannau said:
Sauteeing's all about moving the pan a lot isn't it. Hence sautee pans tend to have higher sides than your average frying pan, allowing you to swash the food about a little more. Frying's more static in my book - things stay in the same position in the pan and are typically turned over only occasionally.

I harbour a theory that sauteeing has become a fashionable substitute name for frying over the past few years when so many neg connotations have been associated with the latter.

In my book there's deep frying and shallow frying and all the degrees from gentle to vigorous that can entail
 
trashpony said:
The problem with the 'use the same cup rather than A Cup' approach is that if you're making cakes, then eggs are involved. And they're done by number, not cup ;)
Eggs are still done by number if your using weighing scales rather than cups.
 
Back
Top Bottom