Loads of errors in it though, which is a shame. The Mail piece is actually much more accurate, no doubt thanks to the journo spending an hour talking to the LHAG chair before writing it. Loads of press interest right now, which is a bit frustrating because it's at least a year too early. By the time public attention really matters, it'll no doubt have gone away. This is the problem with people turning up without really knowing what's happening of listening to those who do.