would have to disagree - I think a top notch grass player at peak would beat both - as Sampras would have done at his peak. Neither of those two can volley.
Wimbledon 2008...
- Thread starter lenny101
- Start date
would have to disagree - I think a top notch grass player at peak would beat both - as Sampras would have done at his peak. Neither of those two can volley.
T & P
|-o-| (-o-) |-o-|
While the BBC did show the trophy presentation ceremony, they did not show the engravers adding up Nadal's name to the Winners Wall (or whatever it might be called), which annoyed me slightly.Not a huge tennis fan either, but that was fantastic sport.
Would've been nice to see Nadal hold up the trophy, but thanks to an seemingly very ill judged & bad tempered move by Swiss TV (SF2), they unbelievably, cut to their reporter outside centre court, who said that was that & goodbye - just the trophies were about to be presented.
They were running pretty late as it was.
TrippyLondoner
Well-Known Member
Only thing that annoyed me was they didn't talk about nadals win a bit more, but they were running late so you can understand that!
It's worth noting that a 49-year old McEnroe took out Sampras (and Courier) a couple of months ago!
http://www.boston.com/sports/other_sports/tennis/articles/2008/05/05/mcenroe_is_up_to_old_tricks/
http://www.boston.com/sports/other_sports/tennis/articles/2008/05/05/mcenroe_is_up_to_old_tricks/
onthebrightside
thinking too much
Top match. Now Federer needs to get working on his clay game...
