Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Will we ever accept the 'workshy' and just let them get on with it?

I think in this context work could be defined as doing something that has value either as paid employment or as doing something that is beneficial to individuals or society in general.
I wouldn't disagree with that.

But I think that most recent governments' definition of "or as doing something that is beneficial to individuals or society in general" is extremely narrow, and probably confined to the purely financial.
 
those people are effectively doing social work or community work . They should be properly trained, given resources and their efforts recognised. And paid . Even Stephen Hawking works for fucks sake . People with Downes syndrome, all sorts of disabilities and they demand a place in working society . Depression and sense of helplessness goes hand in hand. Work in a proper supportive social environment could help a lot of people I reckon . Better than fucking dole.
I notice that your argument is predicated on exactly the misconception I mentioned in my post - money.

Why does work HAVE to be paid?
 
On the other hand, for people who have always been in work, a period of unemployment can be a humbling experience and therefore probably a wholly positive thing. One should be able to recognise that "there by the grace of god go I" etc when considering other people who are not in paid work.
 
On the other hand, for people who have always been in work, a period of unemployment can be a humbling experience and therefore probably a wholly positive thing. One should be able to recognise that "there by the grace of god go I" etc when considering other people who are not in paid work.
jaysus no, no, no!, fuck being humbled, there is nothing positive about my experience of being unemployed, absolutely nothing, fuck the grace of god.
 
People often see the dole as a gift.
Take it away let them starve trust me that £70 a week keeps the well off safe. The ideal that people would go hungry. It would be civil war
 
I'd like to work a lot less hours - say a couple of 8 hour days a week, or a couple of hours a day Monday to Friday. But I do quite like work in moderation and would hate to be unemployed.

I'm disappointed the Leisure Age, where work is done by machines, hasn't yet arrived. Instead most people I know seem to be working harder and longer.
 
Recently a small bulletin board I frequent had to ask for people for subscriptions for running costs. Everyone who used it regularly paid but it was not obligatory, as it would be unfair on those who could not afford it. One user commented 'Getting some people to pay but then allowing other people to use it for free just seems a bit unfair to me from a strictly neutral perspective'
Of course it's not a neutral perspective and I continue to be dismayed by such an attitude which is often represented in the mainstream media. Especially when it comes from people who are comfortably off. Why should they give a shit about paying for other people to not starve?
 
We want the individuals in our society to be reaching their potential, getting the most out of life, experiencing many of the wonderful things that can be experienced in life, being able to develop their interests, skills and knowledge and the like. Being economically limited, severely restricts people's ability to do any of that. I would prefer full employment and no one below a living wage.
 
People often see the dole as a gift.
Take it away let them starve trust me that £70 a week keeps the well off safe. The ideal that people would go hungry. It would be civil war
The Dole essential is a gift or at least a bit of barter from the ruling class, the deal is we give ya a few quid a week, you lot keep it calm, dont smash the fuckin place up, and ya dont step to us.
 
If you've ever lived along side and known families were people dont work
It has a way of fucking people up, the people i knew who got into work had better lifes.

The family were 3 gens have not worked often had quite a disturbed inner life and a poor moral framework, the individuals from that family who ended up working changed massive amounts. For the better being able to have a job that pays a living wage. Changed those individuals from dangerous, violent people to the kind of people you could have a drink with.

Seeing that change has been a shock. We all thought that the kids from those families would remain amoral. As they had be involed in a murder at 13-14yr olds. Work can be positive if all you've known is street life
Are there really families where three generations have never worked?
JRF. 13 December 2012
New research found that 'cultures of worklessness' was not a good explanation for unemployment.

A new JRF study investigates the concept of 'intergenerational cultures of worklessness'. The idea of 'three generations of the same family who have never worked' appeals to many, including politicians and policy-makers, to explain entrenched worklessness in the UK. Researchers in deprived neighbourhoods in Glasgow and Middlesbrough found that worklessness was not the result of a culture of worklessness, held in families and passed down the generations.
It found that:

Even two generations of complete worklessness in the same family was very rare.

There was no evidence of 'a culture of worklessness' – values, attitudes and behaviours discouraging employment and encouraging welfare dependency – in the families taking part in the research.

Working-age offspring remained strongly committed to conventional values about work and were keen to avoid the poverty and worklessness experienced by their parents.
 
Is full employment impossible in capitalism?

I knew some former East Germans. Everyone had a job, almost a job for life. Of course that system failed in the end and pollution and inefficiency was rife. But pretty much everyone had a job.
 
At this stage, can anyone mention immigrants? you know, coming over here and taking all our jobs!!

eta: no perhaps better not :-)
 
Been There Done That Got The Tee Shirt.
Oh aye, me too, but I was glad of the break for a not insignificant part of it. I'd been working long shifts at unsociable hours for fifteen years, so needed some time to recuperate before getting infected with chronic work syndrome again
 
I really don't care what other people do to be honest, I'm not going to get wound up by someone being workshy, I work and I'm workshy Ffs :D

One of my ' mates posted up a meme on Facebook yesterday saying this.

'All good things come to those who wait, I went a bit ballistic at it and was told not to take it so seriously, then I went on about that sort of shit dividing society .

He shut up then lol
 
It isn't much of a life, living on benefits, people can do better, society should help them do better.

It isn't much of a life, stressed out over-working, people can do better, society should help them do better.

There must be a better way!
 
The Dali Lama, when asked what surprised him most about humanity, answered "Man. Because he sacrifices his health in order to make money. Then he sacrifices money to recuperate his health. And then he is so anxious about the future that he does not enjoy the present; the result being that he does not live in the present or the future; he lives as if he is never going to die, and then dies having never really lived."
 
The Dali Lama, when asked what surprised him most about humanity, answered "Man. Because he sacrifices his health in order to make money. Then he sacrifices money to recuperate his health. And then he is so anxious about the future that he does not enjoy the present; the result being that he does not live in the present or the future; he lives as if he is never going to die, and then dies having never really lived."
I've heard that befor and again , WORD!
 
In the end id be happy to share the wealth
and do a 3 or 4 day week and let others share the fun.

Ever since I was a kid I've been amazed that we have to work 5 days to enjoy 2 off when you're usually to knackerd to enjoy it. Still think the same.

I am not lazy just think working more than enjoying life is completely missing the point
 
Last edited:
If there isn't enough paid work to go round, then it seems unfair to force people to take jobs which they neither want nor would be any good at.

If there isn't enough work to go round and we need people not doing anything for the sake of 'the economy', then we could share out the downtime like jury service. You'd get something in the post saying you were having the next 6 months off on a Citizen's Income, be sent a few leaflets about volunteering and perhaps gardening and that would be that.
 
They don't cost much taxpayers much really
Can't we just let people get on with it and worry about other things?
Obviously this is a barely thought out brainfart, so I am looking forward to getting shot down.

This was in fact government policy when the economy was re-focused onto financial services, it was neccesary to have large amounts of people living on benefits.
Post crash these people are being labeled benefit cheats and told they should be working in factories as the economy is re-balanced in favour of manufacturing.
 
I'm surprised by some of the attitudes in this thread. Work isn't a good thing. Money is the only thing that makes work "good" for the mental health of the majority of people.

How many of you claiming work is a good thing would carry on doing your job if you won the Euromillions quintuple roll-over? If not, why not? If you would, you're either lying to yourself or you are in a tiny minority (potentially true, given the demographics of U75).

Puddy_Tat mentioned the basic income thread and I assume he meant the most recently one that I started. It's worth reading through some of the links I and others have posted, if not the thread itself. Those links show the vast amount of research which has been done that show that the best way to get people out of poverty is to give them money for nothing. Punitive sanctions or 'nudge' policy or whatever else is less efficient than just directly giving people money, no questions asked.

So it's money. Everything is money, in this society at least.

How many of your posting on this thread that work is good for you see yourselves as socialist? How do you square mental well-being with exploitation by capital? The plight of the unemployed and the issues they suffer is not because of a lack of work; it's because of a lack of money and a way to meaningfully contribute to society due to the capitalist mindset being dominant. Imagine a post-capitalist/socialist world where 'work' was what is needed for society to function and not what is required to further enrich an elite: would you still be so happy to go number-crunch risk data for loan defaults? Or photocopy legal documents for multinational companies to sue other multinational companies? Why not, if work is good for you, then it's better than idling.

How do you explain attitudes like this, which are surprisingly common:
I'd like to work a lot less hours - say a couple of 8 hour days a week, or a couple of hours a day Monday to Friday. But I do quite like work in moderation and would hate to be unemployed.

I'm disappointed the Leisure Age, where work is done by machines, hasn't yet arrived. Instead most people I know seem to be working harder and longer.

"Would hate to be unemployed"; "disappointed that a world without work doesn't exist." Which is it? And I don't mean to pick on you specifically, metalguru. This sort of contradiction is common.

Work is shit. There's maybe 1% of people who truly enjoy the work they do (percentages are all made up on the spot, that one included), and there's a bigger but still tiny percentage of people who don't mind the work they do, but would still probably quit if they were mega-rich. The rest go to work to slave away for a boss who doesn't give a shit about them, and don't enjoy either good pay or good working conditions, and the only good thing about the job is they get money to be able to get pissed at the weekend and maybe go on holiday and buy some shoes and whatever else. It's not good for the soul, it's not a measure of worth...it's just an absence of crushing poverty and social stigma.
 
In the end is be happy to share the wealth
Th and do a 3 or 4 day week and let others share the fun.

Ever since I was a kid I've been amazed that we have to work 5 days to enjoy 2 off where you're usually to knackerd to enjoy it. Still think the same.

I am not lazy just think working more than enjoying life is completely missing the point

I agree, people dying unexpectedly has caused me to re-evaluate my priorities a bit. If we want to do things, good things, we better get on with it. This week a 14 year old kid was killed in a road accident. A friend recently completed chemo, an uncle died, etc .... better make the most of now, who knows how long we have!
 
Back
Top Bottom