1927
Funnier than he thinks he is.
It is not true that the post office has fewer customers because of the internet. Who do you think delivers the parcels for Amazon and Ebay etc?
Not the Royal Mail!
It is not true that the post office has fewer customers because of the internet. Who do you think delivers the parcels for Amazon and Ebay etc?
Not the Royal Mail!

Yes they fucking do! Jesus christ, how many times. It's even been pointed out on this bloody thread.

not the parcels i had delivered today and the one coming tomorrow.
it's not them either, it's another lot.Royal Mail don't deliver parcels full stop - that's Parcelforce
it's not them either, it's another lot.
and they do deliver stuff from amazon, i've certainly had the usual postie deliver amazon bits in the past.
£300 is the average figure. At the high end, redundancies will certainly result.No not sod the workers, no one is going to be made redundant for a £300 loss. These small businesses are also going to suffer if the posties lose and privatisation ensues, they're going to be the ones being bled dry by alternative providers concerned only with their profits - they'll be the ones under pressure to cut their overheads then.
Anyone who doesn't support the strike is effectively saying sod these workers, and not only sod them, but also sod the current 120 000 postal staff, and sod the vulnerable who rely on the sevice, sod the millions who simply can't afford the rates the alternative providers charge and sod the rest of us who simply want mail delivered at a decnmt time by staff who aren't overworked, underpaid, bullied harrassed and treated like shit.
The RM are the only ones who can deliver these crucial services - there is no one else, the downstream access agreements themselves are a covert admittance of this fact. That's shown by all these companies coming straight back after 2007. Or by Exeter council who moved away from RM delivery of their letters coming back with their tail between their legs.
Let's have some critical analysis of the FSB and what their possible interets are in pushing this nagle as well shall we?
£300 is the average figure. At the high end, redundancies will certainly result.
Bled dry? That's not how private competition works ... it drives prices down, not up. If Royal Mail can make £1.2 billion from the "unprofitable" business it's been left with, there's massive scope to reduce prices to the public, which is exactly what competition can achieve.
As far as I'm concerned, privitisation can't come fast enough.
I work in collections for Royal Mail, I see many large and small businesses during the course of the week. Not one has said how they are facing redundances yet. They do however wish me luck in the fight, ask when the strikes are and generally offer their support.
Nonsense - it's what everyone else is saying not me!. Why do you persist in this pretence that you've got no dog in this fight? I think everyone whose been following these threads can see through it easily enough.
If the CWU does "win"... how exactly does this make it more or less likely that the govt will go ahead with privatisation and/or the cessation of the universal service?
Can anyone answer me this question?
Sorry, misread. I'd say businesses aren't losing millions anyway - they're just having to wait longer to get their profits.
The bills and payments that didn't get through straight away cos of the strike will just dissapear into the ether then?
No. Normal service will be resumed or the massive workforce of agency strikebreakers will get the post delivered. Either way, the monies will still flow. All this dramatic stuff about 'bringing the country to it's knees' is straight out of the 70's book of anti-union cliches
If my posts stand out, I would suggest it is precisely because I have NOT got an axe to grind.
Management needs the workforce, the workforce needs the management, neither of them are going anywhere, the sooner they get together and make an agreement, the better for everybody.
I'm not saying that
What I'm saying that a number of small firms will face difficult cash flow probs - thats all, no one brought to their knees. Just that the ones whose pain might move the Govts arse, ie the big boys, will not be affected at all
Same here. Because I've a moderately severe mobility impairment I do a lot of non-staple shopping via mail order, and have done for the last 15 years or so, and many people, elderly, disabled or not, also do so, hence the massive rise in packet post.Well, you seem to be saying it quite a lot, I don't know who these other people are.
I get loads through the post. I write letters, receive packages etc etc. I'm in the middle of a busy city and I rely on the post for lots of things. If I was elderly, or living right out in the sticks I would rely on Royal Mail even more.
Yup.Governments of various complexions are getting rid of so much that is good. It makes me weep because I've been around long enough to see what we've already lost and what we stand to lose.

I didn't say Royal Mail lost £millions, I said business is losing millions (because of the strike).

I'm not. All our mainstream politicians bought into the neo-liberal economic mythology, so very few of them have hairy enough balls to actually row back from that and say "we were wrong, privatisation is a disaster for the consumers".This fucking deranged idea that vital national services, water, gas, elecricity, mail, etc are better off being run by private companies is so damaging to peoples lives I'm astonished that no polititian hasn't spoken out.

Yep, it's insane, but it's also insane to assume that anybody in government or into politics and economics from about 1989-on (perhaps even earlier) didn't realise that this sort of "strip-mining" approach was the logical end-product of privatised utilities.Its just become an arguement that no one evers bothers to adress
All these comapnies end up receiving massive Govt subsidies in order to cream the wedge off to pay out to their shareholders, which here in the UK are mainly big institutions running pensions, insurance, etc wedge we, joe normal has given them. WE need better and better results form these money running firms primarily because the the costs via these privatised utlility cos keep going up - its insane!!!!!
Pragmatic capitalism. If you're not forking out big money on essentials, you've got more money for consumption of non-essentialsFair play with regard to steel makes, car makers etc but the basics of life should be provided at cost - even fucking George Soros and Warren Buffet think that -hardly wild eyed lefties!!!!!!!
Pretty much, and in the meantime business will be collaborating with political think-tanks and other policy formulators to arrange new and improved waves to fleece us once we've realised that we're looking at the emperor's naked arse.These thiongs are sadly, like most human activity, fashion driven, some fucking daft idea takes hold and at least a generation or two has to pass before any bugger gets round to saying the Emperors got no kit on
I support the striking posties (obviously) - but this thread is making me think, what kind of victory is possible for the CWU in this dispute? At best a moraturium on unilateral "modernisation" from on high, respite from bullying management, some kind of commitment on pensions, and some union involvement in future restructuring proposals [of course this would not be negligble in the sense that it would demonstrate to other workers the potential power of industrial action].
But Crozier et al are hardly going to be convinced to put a public service ethos ahead of commercial motives; New Labour aren't going to require management to listen to the public's views on the postal service; nor are the Tories going to feel bound by anything that it is agreed.

I'm wishing they do, but I doubt it, not with that bastard Mandelson involved and that twat Crozier in charge.