Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Will the CWU win?

Who will win?


  • Total voters
    76
I get most of my package deliveries via RM rather than Parcelforce or a courier. In fact I generally insist on it because it's more reliable.
 
it's not them either, it's another lot.

and they do deliver stuff from amazon, i've certainly had the usual postie deliver amazon bits in the past.


Yeah we deliver "packets" which are the cd's, books and boxed sets etc. Anything large is a parcel normally and that would go via Parcelforce, City Link et al.

We stopped handling parcels in the late 80's when Parcelforce split from letters.
 
No not sod the workers, no one is going to be made redundant for a £300 loss. These small businesses are also going to suffer if the posties lose and privatisation ensues, they're going to be the ones being bled dry by alternative providers concerned only with their profits - they'll be the ones under pressure to cut their overheads then.

Anyone who doesn't support the strike is effectively saying sod these workers, and not only sod them, but also sod the current 120 000 postal staff, and sod the vulnerable who rely on the sevice, sod the millions who simply can't afford the rates the alternative providers charge and sod the rest of us who simply want mail delivered at a decnmt time by staff who aren't overworked, underpaid, bullied harrassed and treated like shit.

The RM are the only ones who can deliver these crucial services - there is no one else, the downstream access agreements themselves are a covert admittance of this fact. That's shown by all these companies coming straight back after 2007. Or by Exeter council who moved away from RM delivery of their letters coming back with their tail between their legs.

Let's have some critical analysis of the FSB and what their possible interets are in pushing this nagle as well shall we?
£300 is the average figure. At the high end, redundancies will certainly result.

Bled dry? That's not how private competition works ... it drives prices down, not up. If Royal Mail can make £1.2 billion from the "unprofitable" business it's been left with, there's massive scope to reduce prices to the public, which is exactly what competition can achieve.

As far as I'm concerned, privatisation can't come fast enough.
 
£300 is the average figure. At the high end, redundancies will certainly result.

Bled dry? That's not how private competition works ... it drives prices down, not up. If Royal Mail can make £1.2 billion from the "unprofitable" business it's been left with, there's massive scope to reduce prices to the public, which is exactly what competition can achieve.

As far as I'm concerned, privitisation can't come fast enough.

I'm gonna repeat myself here so sorry if you've already read it but:

I work in collections for Royal Mail, I see many large and small businesses during the course of the week. Not one has said how they are facing redundances yet. They do however wish me luck in the fight, ask when the strikes are and generally offer their support.

I'm sure that its making it difficult for some of them , but incase you'd forgotton its pretty difficult for us at the moment, its not like we actually want to throw away a days wages - would you?
Its a last resort to try and get Royal Mail to talk to our union, to try to get them to honour the agreement that was drawn up 2 years ago.

People do not vote for industrial action on a whim, Last week we had a postwoman collapse after perfoming one of Royal Mails new "modern" duties!
 
I work in collections for Royal Mail, I see many large and small businesses during the course of the week. Not one has said how they are facing redundances yet. They do however wish me luck in the fight, ask when the strikes are and generally offer their support.

I had a meeting this morning with about 80 small businesses from the local Chamber of Commerce, the strike was discussed, I was pleasantly surprised at the level of support for the posties and I didn't hear a single person complain about how it was impacting on their business.

I don’t know how it compares to others, but this Chamber is fairly apolitical unlike the FSB, which at national level likes to make a lot of noise and get media coverage in an attempt to justify their existence to their members, I would take whatever their P.R. department is turning out with a pinch of salt TBH.
 
Nonsense - it's what everyone else is saying not me!. Why do you persist in this pretence that you've got no dog in this fight? I think everyone whose been following these threads can see through it easily enough.

If my posts stand out, I would suggest it is precisely because I have NOT got an axe to grind.

Management needs the workforce, the workforce needs the management, neither of them are going anywhere, the sooner they get together and make an agreement, the better for everybody.
 
"If the CWU does "win"... how exactly does this make it more or less likely that the govt will go ahead with privatisation and/or the cessation of the universal service?"

Can anyone answer me this question?

Quite frankly the only thing stopping privatisation is you the public. As long as you are against it then its unlikely to happen.

As for privatisation driving prices down - worked well for the trains , gas , telecomms etc , they are sooooo much cheaper than they were when they were nationalised
 
Sorry, misread. I'd say businesses aren't losing millions anyway - they're just having to wait longer to get their profits.

The majority of people in the UK work for firms that dont make millions
It those samller, old school companies that will be hurt most - they cant afford the overhead of electronic payment systems and rely on cheques

It will make fuck all difference to BP, Sainsbuggers, etc - all the big boys in other words
 
The bills and payments that didn't get through straight away cos of the strike will just dissapear into the ether then?

No. Normal service will be resumed or the massive workforce of agency strikebreakers will get the post delivered. Either way, the monies will still flow. All this dramatic stuff about 'bringing the country to it's knees' is straight out of the 70's book of anti-union cliches
 
This fucking deranged idea that vital national services, water, gas, elecricity, mail, etc are better off being run by private companies is so damaging to peoples lives I'm astonished that no polititian hasn't spoken out.
Its just become an arguement that no one evers bothers to adress
All these comapnies end up receiving massive Govt subsidies in order to cream the wedge off to pay out to their shareholders, which here in the UK are mainly big institutions running pensions, insurance, etc wedge we, joe normal has given them. WE need better and better results form these money running firms primarily because the the costs via these privatised utlility cos keep going up - its insane!!!!!

Fair play with regard to steel makes, car makers etc but the basics of life should be provided at cost - even fucking George Soros and Warren Buffet think that -hardly wild eyed lefties!!!!!!!

These thiongs are sadly, like most human activity, fashion driven, some fucking daft idea takes hold and at least a generation or two has to pass before any bugger gets round to saying the Emperors got no kit on
 
The bills and payments that didn't get through straight away cos of the strike will just dissapear into the ether then?

No. Normal service will be resumed or the massive workforce of agency strikebreakers will get the post delivered. Either way, the monies will still flow. All this dramatic stuff about 'bringing the country to it's knees' is straight out of the 70's book of anti-union cliches

I'm not saying that
What I'm saying that a number of small firms will face difficult cash flow probs - thats all, no one brought to their knees. Just that the ones whose pain might move the Govts arse, ie the big boys, will not be affected at all
 
If my posts stand out, I would suggest it is precisely because I have NOT got an axe to grind.

Management needs the workforce, the workforce needs the management, neither of them are going anywhere, the sooner they get together and make an agreement, the better for everybody.

I didn't say that they stand out. I said that you clearly have a position and i find it annoying that you pretend you don't.
 
I'm not saying that
What I'm saying that a number of small firms will face difficult cash flow probs - thats all, no one brought to their knees. Just that the ones whose pain might move the Govts arse, ie the big boys, will not be affected at all

There will be delays to 1st class mail but only a couple of days at most.

As i understand it the purpose of the strikes is to cause a massive backlog of Mailsort. Third class advertising letters commonly known as junk mail which are sorted and delivered last.

The big boys will be the ones affected.
 
It's been great - where my gf works it's finally allowed them to force the suppliers that still mail them cheques to move over to BACS transfers. So in the short term, it's been brilliant for their business.

As for myself, I hadn't noticed outside of the press coverage. From what I've read about it, management seem fuckheaded about it. But the Posties are going to lose either way - it's just a case of losing less badly? RM is archaic.
 
Well, you seem to be saying it quite a lot, I don't know who these other people are.
I get loads through the post. I write letters, receive packages etc etc. I'm in the middle of a busy city and I rely on the post for lots of things. If I was elderly, or living right out in the sticks I would rely on Royal Mail even more.
Same here. Because I've a moderately severe mobility impairment I do a lot of non-staple shopping via mail order, and have done for the last 15 years or so, and many people, elderly, disabled or not, also do so, hence the massive rise in packet post.
Governments of various complexions are getting rid of so much that is good. It makes me weep because I've been around long enough to see what we've already lost and what we stand to lose.
Yup. :(
 
I didn't say Royal Mail lost £millions, I said business is losing millions (because of the strike).

If this plays anything like previous forecasts of losses due to postal strikes, the "millions" will have been over-estimated by at least a factor of three by the likes of the CBI.
It's odd how, however many times strikes that affect business happen, they always manage to over-estimate losses so profoundly. Myself, I wouldn't want people with such poor foresight in charge of a hotdog stand, let alone a large business. :)
 
This fucking deranged idea that vital national services, water, gas, elecricity, mail, etc are better off being run by private companies is so damaging to peoples lives I'm astonished that no polititian hasn't spoken out.
I'm not. All our mainstream politicians bought into the neo-liberal economic mythology, so very few of them have hairy enough balls to actually row back from that and say "we were wrong, privatisation is a disaster for the consumers".
Especially when so many of the fuckers are hoping for a post-career sinecure on the board of one of the privatised utilities. :mad:
Its just become an arguement that no one evers bothers to adress
All these comapnies end up receiving massive Govt subsidies in order to cream the wedge off to pay out to their shareholders, which here in the UK are mainly big institutions running pensions, insurance, etc wedge we, joe normal has given them. WE need better and better results form these money running firms primarily because the the costs via these privatised utlility cos keep going up - its insane!!!!!
Yep, it's insane, but it's also insane to assume that anybody in government or into politics and economics from about 1989-on (perhaps even earlier) didn't realise that this sort of "strip-mining" approach was the logical end-product of privatised utilities.
Fair play with regard to steel makes, car makers etc but the basics of life should be provided at cost - even fucking George Soros and Warren Buffet think that -hardly wild eyed lefties!!!!!!!
Pragmatic capitalism. If you're not forking out big money on essentials, you've got more money for consumption of non-essentials
These thiongs are sadly, like most human activity, fashion driven, some fucking daft idea takes hold and at least a generation or two has to pass before any bugger gets round to saying the Emperors got no kit on
Pretty much, and in the meantime business will be collaborating with political think-tanks and other policy formulators to arrange new and improved waves to fleece us once we've realised that we're looking at the emperor's naked arse.
 
I posted this on another thread but relevant here:

I support the striking posties (obviously) - but this thread is making me think, what kind of victory is possible for the CWU in this dispute? At best a moraturium on unilateral "modernisation" from on high, respite from bullying management, some kind of commitment on pensions, and some union involvement in future restructuring proposals [of course this would not be negligble in the sense that it would demonstrate to other workers the potential power of industrial action].

But Crozier et al are hardly going to be convinced to put a public service ethos ahead of commercial motives; New Labour aren't going to require management to listen to the public's views on the postal service; nor are the Tories going to feel bound by anything that it is agreed.
 
Like many I support the postal workers completely, but I'm also fairly pessimistic, like articula8 above -- even a short term 'win' for the CWU won't necessarily be sustainable over the longer term, given the determination of the free marketeers to privatise. :(
 
Back
Top Bottom