As for Russia, they'll get a second wind for fifteen years or so but they have far too many structural problems to become a superpower again. The population is declining significantly, the country is completely corrupt, the military is a paper tiger, they have no strong allies or friends internationally and their actions has scared off any western companies that might want to invest.
I'm also curious as to why you think that Russia becoming a superpower again would be a good thing? I can't see a single positive outcome from a reborn Russia and think that, if anything, we, in the west, should be working together to prevent Russia gaining power.
I'd be interested in knowing your arguments against India emerging from poverty too Frogwoman.

A power which can project overwhelming force to any part of the planet, which recieves almost universal acceptance of that power and as such rarely has to use it on major scale, as others bend to their will without it, simply because of that knowledge of its powerDefine 'superpower', which no one has managed yet
So nothing whatsoever to do with economics then? Only military power?
Russian oil is most likely in decline now, so they can't rely on that for ever
Yes. Them and China could have the world by the balls if they worked together within about twenty years I reckon.
Do you see it re-emerging as a superpower?
Most likely? This is like the population argument. There's nothing concrete to back it up. Or is there?
Link(Bloomberg) -- Russia's oil production fell for the ninth straight month in September as producers struggled with rising costs and maturing fields, bringing the world's second- biggest crude exporter closer to its first annual drop in output since 1998.
Production fell 0.4 percent to 9.83 million barrels of crude a day (40.2 million metric tons a month) compared with a year earlier, according to figures released by the Energy Ministry's CDU-TEK unit.
Output in Russia's oil heartland of western Siberia is flagging as older fields mature and companies invest in harder- to-reach regions to tap deposits. In July, parliament approved tax breaks championed by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to spur investment in national production.
So basicaly Russia is going to have one hell of a job keeping up production at above 9 million barrels a day. Most likely it will be experiancing decline in oil production. Especialy as projects like Sakhalin II are very expensive due to enviromental difficulties and given the basement oil price no one is going to be investing big money into new high cost fields on melting tundra for while.They include Gazprom’s 100,000 bbl/d Prirazlomnoye field (2010), Lukoil's 150,000 bbl/d South Khylchuyu field (mid-2008), and year-round production from the Sakhalin II field. Lukoil/ConocoPhillips's TimanPechora project, and Rosneft's Vankorskoye (300,000 bbl/d) and Komsomolskoye fields will also help stem production losses at older fields. Lukoil also expects around 30,000 bbl/d of production from its North Caspian fields after 2010.
As for Russias population
![]()
Google has all the answers you need
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/988723.stm
Its a long established fact they are in population decline.
Leaving aside the oil question for now. As I mentioned above, and the BBC article you quoted seems to bear this out, the population decline is as a result of an inadequate system of health care for the population. This, along with other market led 'solutions', has left people feeling that they have no future.
The countries with the worst health care systems in the world have amoung the highest population growths.The countries with the worst health care systems in the world have amoung the highest population growths.
Russias problems stem from low fertility rates (mothers having less babies) not from infant mortality.What about countries which see a steady decline in their health care systems from let's say 'first world' to 'third world'.
The causes of the low fertility rates are probibly related to the general pessimism of Russian women though.


Russia is still a superpower, it will probably become increasingly relevant over the next 50 years, but within a century it could be a spent force, much the same as the USA.
I had a long talk with someone who had been to Russia recently, and what they found weird was that so many ordinary people are disgusted with the so called capitalisation of Russia. Once upon a time they had real health care...
I wonder if that will result a revolution or voting for someone different .