Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Will Russia Become a New Superpower?

Militarily Russia could once again become a superpower if they invest in their hardware heavily (not counting nukes). But unless they plan to rebuild an empire by force I don't know what that would achieve.
 
Russian oil is most likely in decline now, so they can't rely on that for ever
 
As for Russia, they'll get a second wind for fifteen years or so but they have far too many structural problems to become a superpower again. The population is declining significantly, the country is completely corrupt, the military is a paper tiger, they have no strong allies or friends internationally and their actions has scared off any western companies that might want to invest.

You're the second person to mention the population decline. I vaguely remember a while back that there was talk of Russia offering small chunks of land to people if they they built on and farmed the land within so many years. But I do wonder how many outsiders would want to move to Russia. Are there any reliable figures on population decline and reasons why?

As for the rest well you can look at the US and say the same at the moment.


I'm also curious as to why you think that Russia becoming a superpower again would be a good thing? I can't see a single positive outcome from a reborn Russia and think that, if anything, we, in the west, should be working together to prevent Russia gaining power.

I didn't say it would be a good thing. I said it would be ironic.
 
irobot - i meant it's improved from boris yeltsin's time, don't know how much mind, but there's certainly not the same crisis there was back in the early 1990s

not that im much of a fan of putin et al ..
 
Yes. Them and China could have the world by the balls if they worked together within about twenty years I reckon.
 
I'd be interested in knowing your arguments against India emerging from poverty too Frogwoman.

in every great power that's ever existed, there has still been substantial poverty within its' borders. the two can, do coexist, and always have:confused:
 
It almost impossible for Russia to remain as weak as it has been for the last couple of decades, as to the World power stuff, not so sure.
India doesn't actually want world power status it seems to me, for which I think the deserve massive respect - they do believe in making their country an economic power but I dont any desire for projecting military force on a gloabl basis. Still give it 50 years, that may change
China on the other hand is big on the military power bollocks and the way the place is run they have every chance of being a World Power

I wish that theis Power biz would just fuck off, it just fucks things up for everyone
 
Define 'superpower', which no one has managed yet

BRIC are going to run into several major and massive issues that didn't really affect the US/EU period of industrialisation, or did but on a smaller scale.

China and India still have massive peasant populations, and will for the foreseeable future.
They also both have horrifying environmental issues, now and being stored up for the future. I read a report last week of how the region of China responsible for 25% of it's rice is turning into a dustbowl, similar to the problems the US had in the 1930s - that's a 1/4 of it's staple food dissappearing. Anyone think that's not going to cause a few issues to a nascent superpower?

India is the same - it's got a wider disparity between peasant and urban dweller, and has similar environmental issues to China

Russia could blow it's primary resources and make a ton of money and not reinvest that money into 2ndary and tertiary industry - when the oil runs out in Saudi there's not a lot there to replace it as an industry, and the same could happen in Russia

Don't know enough about Brazil...
 
Define 'superpower', which no one has managed yet
A power which can project overwhelming force to any part of the planet, which recieves almost universal acceptance of that power and as such rarely has to use it on major scale, as others bend to their will without it, simply because of that knowledge of its power

Or something like that.
 
Most likely? This is like the population argument. There's nothing concrete to back it up. Or is there?
(Bloomberg) -- Russia's oil production fell for the ninth straight month in September as producers struggled with rising costs and maturing fields, bringing the world's second- biggest crude exporter closer to its first annual drop in output since 1998.

Production fell 0.4 percent to 9.83 million barrels of crude a day (40.2 million metric tons a month) compared with a year earlier, according to figures released by the Energy Ministry's CDU-TEK unit.

Output in Russia's oil heartland of western Siberia is flagging as older fields mature and companies invest in harder- to-reach regions to tap deposits. In July, parliament approved tax breaks championed by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to spur investment in national production.
Link

russiak.gif


The first peak was for the old super giants like the almighty Samotlor peaked in the mid 80s with primary recovery technologies. In the 90s and 00s western oil technology was brought in to raise production again after the horrible decline experianced. The sort of low tech secondary recovery technologies used by russian oil and gas companies like water flooding was not really doing the trick. So all the nifty 3D siemography, horozontal wells and enhanced water and gas drive techonologies were brought in. Now those old giants are again in decline and not enough new fields have been brough online to overcome this. The new fields coming online include

They include Gazprom’s 100,000 bbl/d Prirazlomnoye field (2010), Lukoil's 150,000 bbl/d South Khylchuyu field (mid-2008), and year-round production from the Sakhalin II field. Lukoil/ConocoPhillips's TimanPechora project, and Rosneft's Vankorskoye (300,000 bbl/d) and Komsomolskoye fields will also help stem production losses at older fields. Lukoil also expects around 30,000 bbl/d of production from its North Caspian fields after 2010.
So basicaly Russia is going to have one hell of a job keeping up production at above 9 million barrels a day. Most likely it will be experiancing decline in oil production. Especialy as projects like Sakhalin II are very expensive due to enviromental difficulties and given the basement oil price no one is going to be investing big money into new high cost fields on melting tundra for while.

As for Russias population

image005.jpg


Google has all the answers you need
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/988723.stm


Its a long established fact they are in population decline.
 
I had a long talk with someone who had been to Russia recently, and what they found weird was that so many ordinary people are disgusted with the so called capitalisation of Russia. Once upon a time they had real health care...
 
As for Russias population

image005.jpg


Google has all the answers you need
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/988723.stm


Its a long established fact they are in population decline.

Leaving aside the oil question for now. As I mentioned above, and the BBC article you quoted seems to bear this out, the population decline is as a result of an inadequate system of health care for the population. This, along with other market led 'solutions', has left people feeling that they have no future.
 
Leaving aside the oil question for now. As I mentioned above, and the BBC article you quoted seems to bear this out, the population decline is as a result of an inadequate system of health care for the population. This, along with other market led 'solutions', has left people feeling that they have no future.
:hmm: The countries with the worst health care systems in the world have amoung the highest population growths.
 
What about countries which see a steady decline in their health care systems from let's say 'first world' to 'third world'.
Russias problems stem from low fertility rates (mothers having less babies) not from infant mortality.

The causes of the low fertility rates are probibly related to the general pessimism of Russian women though.
 
The causes of the low fertility rates are probibly related to the general pessimism of Russian women though.

Must admit I agree with this been here 2 months so far this year and its easy to see why people are pessimistic. Yesterday someone for the first time here actually smiled back at me (was a baby in a pram that I was waving at and generally playing the clown for), even the mother just scowled at me as if I was teaching the kid bad habits. :D
 
The USA may be a shite super power but its democratic and Obama won't be George bush. The other would be super powers don't bade well for the earth.
china runs over students with tanks
Russian journalists commit suicide a bit too frequently :(
I wish the EU could get its act together just so that the USA is not the only player in town that considers democracy an the rule of law vital
 
Russia is still a superpower, it will probably become increasingly relevant over the next 50 years, but within a century it could be a spent force, much the same as the USA.
 
Russia is still a superpower, it will probably become increasingly relevant over the next 50 years, but within a century it could be a spent force, much the same as the USA.

well post-British empires just don't have the moral fibre to see out more than a century

*stiffens upper lip and glances nervously over at China*
 
I dunno, I suppose it is silly for me to predict the rate of empire entropy. Im sorta hoping that one positive about resource woes is maybe there will be no superpowers in 100 years.
 
I had a long talk with someone who had been to Russia recently, and what they found weird was that so many ordinary people are disgusted with the so called capitalisation of Russia. Once upon a time they had real health care...

I wonder if that will result a revolution or voting for someone different .
 
Russia will be a power but not a superpower, certainly nothing comparable to the US. Their current resurgence is based on the incredibly high oil price, now thats falling back I think they're going to be a little less belligerent.

India is an interesting one, they need some incredible rate of growth just to stand still (something like 8% I think) because of the high population growth.
 
Back
Top Bottom