The BBC has been blinded by the reshuffle. The headlines are now all about who is coming and going, rather than Brown's position. So, in the short term, it may have paid off.
Miliband coming out in support of Brown probably prolongs Gordons tenure.
Or else positions him for being able to come forward, with great reluctance, when Brown is forced out.
He also wanted Balls in Number 11, but Darling refused to go to another job, so he had to keep him.All this reshuffling is just the last throw of the dice; he wanted to do the reshuffle on Monday to stop the awful election results being the main headlines. Now that he's had to jump early
could lose every single council seat
could lose every single council seat
You mean control over every council rather than every seat?
.Spectator said:Worst for Labour, best for the Tories: Brown stays as PM but bottles out of moving Darling. The result: a lame duck PM and a lame duck Chancellor. The Tories would love facing a Chancellor who clearly doesn’t have the confidence of the Prime Minister and a Prime Minister who was too weak to reshuffle as he wanted to.
Best for Labour, worst for the Tories: Brown is forced out as the Cabinet reshuffle collapses around him. Alan Johnson is crowned Labour leader and easily puts together a Cabinet with jobs for Balls and other prominent Brownites as well as returns for some of the talent on the Labour backbenches. The departure of Brown presents Labour with one last chance to reconnect with the electorate.
If we end up with Brown as PM and Balls as Chancellor, I think we’re on the same political trajectory as now: heading for a Labour defeat and a decent Tory majority. If we have the Lame Duck Ministry then we could be heading for a spectacular Tory win.
Yes what youve said is probably true but all the same, the quickest exit for Gordon would have been if he had failed to find enough people to stay in cabinet, and it looks like his has dodged that pitfall.
Do you think there is any truth to the idea that the appearance of loyalty and unity is taken more seriously by Labour than the Tories? We always hear in the press about how easily the Tories end up divided and fighting in the past, maybe Labour has different instincts or would punish the unloyal more severely?
But as I understand if they want to force Brown to go that still requires the Unions imput and thats where it could all go a little bit funny for those wanting him out. I dont know enough (actually nothing at all) about how the main Unions would want to square up but I cannot imagine many NL candidates for Browns job wanting to have to go cap in hand to them.
Good enough for you and your 'buisiness' though paul.Paul Kenny, the GMB leader, says "It's obvious now the coup is on. We will not be leaping to the support of Mr Purnell. We want a party led by people driven by principles and not by chauffeurs."
Looks that way.nice quote.
That's him backing Johnson then
It's instructive that Kenny didn't say "this attempted coup" or that it "mustn't succeed" but that it's now on.no union leader (well, LP affiliated union leader) will put the knife in before the parliamentary party has already stabbed GB to death already, but that seems to be getting closer and closer. Megg Munn doing the stabbing now
IMO he ain't going anywhere. The economy seems to be recovering a bit and no way is he going to let someone else take the credit for his hard work.
he'l be gone on monday, pressure will build up over the weekend...
jilted john will play through his resignation speech
i dreamt it ... it will happen