Discussion in 'UK politics, current affairs and news' started by Pickman's model, Jun 27, 2013.
you'd think of all publications, the Mail would be the one to get that correct
What's wrong with it - am I missing something obvious?
yes. when was germany defeated in the second war?
The Wehrmacht was officially dissolved in 1946, so that's probably where that came from. A bit like the first world war ending in 1919 on war memorials.
when did they stop fighting, bi0boy? and where were they fighting in 1935?
Did they continue to fight for Hitler after he was dead and the allies had claimed victory though? I think the most reasonable explanation here is that the Mail is shit.
IIRC. '35 is when the personal oath of loyalty to Adolf Hitler was brought in.
This from the paper who wrote "Hurrah for the Blackshirts".
Dacre gets to publish his petulant rant in his own shitrag. What a strange universe he inhabits.
The capitalisation of "REAL" is the editorial equivalent of screaming, "NO, U", demonstrating the level of thoughtfulness and insight which the Daily Mail can bring to the table.
That's some cuntzpah!
Worse than Hitler!
Don't know if you can read it all from that screenshot but it is quite extraordinary, and basically all a retaliation for that cartoon in the Guardian
Look at the state of it, desperately trying to distance themselves from Hopkins.
Does look like the bunker days of dacre.
The Daily Mail is that shit it didn't recognise Field Marshall Erwin Rommel sharing his canteen with a soldier whilst in command of the Afrika Korps.
I would have thought one of the propaganda staff editors would have recognised one of their great heroes.
sounds like the cunt Dacre is pretty rattled. Good. Someone should show him that cartoon every time his loathsome rag publishes yet another button-pushing act of incitement.
when the mail tries to correct and fucks it up
Tbf Am sure that the Mail was no doubt still supporting Hitler in 1946..
Daily Mail Branded An 'Open Sewer' After Tabloid Launches Extraordinary Attack On The Guardian | HuffPost UK
Perhaps if they took even the slightest bit of responsibility for the racist filth spewed and uprated under their articles every single fucking day then they might have the beginnings of an argument.
I love the bit where Paul Dacre claimed the Mail's website is a completely different entity from the printed version.
What a supreme cunt.
And lied about them having separate publishers. Both DMG Media.
You need to take into account that for the wankers a the Mail, it's a given that Generals etc lead from the rear, so seeing a picture of an officer mixing with an enlisted man would have provoked the assumption that it couldn't possibly be the Field Marshall, just some look-a-like junior.
Copper on the left hand side looks like he's having it away with the detained person's video camera and monopod, the thieving cunt!
Not an enlisted soldier however. Check his epaulettes, field glasses and map case.
I've still got that thousand yard stare.
Oh well it must be true then.
Indeed- the rest of rothermeres stable was equally narsty- Rohermere once ran a competition in the London evening news offering 500 tickets to a BUF rally in the Albert Hall to the lucky winners who wrote in to say why the blackshirts are dead great. The DM gets the headlines, but the local papers disseminated the message on a regional level.
Separate names with a comma.