Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

why no stop the war demo?

The difference being that Blair clearly took sides offering support for the Israeli invasion, Israeli opearations falling into what he saw as part of his and Bush's 'war on terror'.

This on the other hand is between two states on an issue which seems to effedct them pretty exclusively, and as a result the UK government has not felt the need to weigh in on either side.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7553508.stm

Prime Minister Gordon Brown says there is "no justification" for Russia's military action in Georgia.

He said the intervention "threatens the stability of the entire region and risks a humanitarian catastrophe".

"There is a clear responsibility on the Russian government to bring this conflict quickly to an end," he said.

We have now. So has the US.
 
In light of these developments, let me explain further.

We as a country are allied with Israel. I would argue after the US we are their second greatest ally. Therefore, protesting against the governments stance on supporting the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, might have suspended and halted that invasion leading to less lives being lost. The ceasefire in the end did lead to less people losing their lives. There are now less people dying in Lebanon then there were during the Israeli invasion. That was the aim of those stop the war marches.

Given that Russia is not our ally, what exactly do you want stop the war to protest against?

The governments current stance on the situation (opposition to Russia's invasion but the basic admission that NOONE is going to go to war with Russia over Georgia)? All that that could achieve would be Britain declaring war on Russia. Great move.

Alternatively stop the war could organise a protest outside the Russian embassy. But considering the Russian government doesnt give a fuck about what the British government thinks, let alone it's people, I doubt there would be any point, particularly as the Russian governement could easily pass off anti Russian protests as UK government sponsored idiots.

So one thing you suggest stop the war should do could logically only lead to a world war, and the only other thing they could do would be utterly, utterly pointless. Is that clear now?
 
It's obvious barney pig was just pointing out the hypocricy of the activist scene.
Mmm, but it gets a bit boring when it comes from people who clearly have no intention of doing anything about, well, anything.

It irritates me on the same level as people who bemoan working class people moving towards the right and then try to justify crossing picket lines (naming no names :p)
 
I think we should all write stern letters of complaint to the leadership of both sides, telling them to put their toys back in the box and play nicely

:D

Capital notion my dear fellow! I'm sure if we all follow this plan they'll all sit round the table and smoke the peace pipe. After all they are but honest gentleman what what
 
Mmm, but it gets a bit boring when it comes from people who clearly have no intention of doing anything about, well, anything.
But everyone knows that all anti war demos have to be organised by the SWP! I mean, otherwise all the banners wouldn't have the tops ripped off. :confused:
 
But everyone knows that all anti war demos have to be organised by the SWP! I mean, otherwise all the banners wouldn't have the tops ripped off. :confused:

Nice one!

I for one will turn out for a demo against the invasion of Georgia. This is an act of outright aggression. One thing which will be good about such a demo is there will be a total lack of Swappies there. And a bigger bonus will be no George Galloway.
 
hang on liberals! Surely 'we' SUPPORT the war!

"Down with imperialist NATO backed Georgian aggression against the peace loving Ossetians! NOW!"

" Down with western control of asian oil resources! Now!"

"Bomb the pipeline!"

or something like that ..
 
Nice one!

I for one will turn out for a demo against the invasion of Georgia. This is an act of outright aggression. One thing which will be good about such a demo is there will be a total lack of Swappies there. And a bigger bonus will be no George Galloway.

It's not an invasion of Georgia, it is a police action to defend Russian citizens from Georgian aggression.
 
It's not an invasion of Georgia, it is a police action to defend Russian citizens from Georgian aggression.

Utter bollocks. You are George Galloway and I claim my £5. :D Not heard such a blind expression of faith in a Tyrant since Georgie boy licked the Iranian Govts arsehole.

There has been tension in the area for a multitude of reasons but it is disingenious to use the 'Sudentenland' reasoning to excuse Russia.

The Georgian Govt are not 100% perfect but they do need supporting against Russian agression and both sides need to be brought together so a that a peaceful resolution to this conflict can be achieved.
 
Nice one!

I for one will turn out for a demo against the invasion of Georgia. This is an act of outright aggression. One thing which will be good about such a demo is there will be a total lack of Swappies there. And a bigger bonus will be no George Galloway.

Where? Outside the Russian embassy?

Given that Russia doesn't mind bumping off its own journalists, regime critics, and is pursuing a vicious war of overt aggression in Chechnya and has been doing for years now, what makes you think that the a picket outside their embassy is going to achieve more then the UK governments limited pressure already has?

As I pointed out above, the SWP's position on this isn't that hypocritical. The fact that you haven't (im making an assumption here) been protesting outside the Russian embassy for the invasion and continued occupation of Chechnya would indicate to me that your position is a little more hypocritical
.
 
EORGIA - WAR - London Meeting

Adam Johannes | 12.08.2008 14:07
GEORGIA, NATO & THE SPREAD OF WAR
Friends Meeting House (Small Hall)
173 Euston Road London NW1 2BJ
6.30 pm, Thursday 14 August, 2008

MARK ALMOND, lecturer in History, Oxford University and expert on the Caucasus

KATE HUDSON, Chair of Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament

BORIS KAGARLITSKI, former director Institute of Globalisation Studies, Moscowand author of, ˜Empire of the Periphery: Russia and the World System"

JOHN REES, Officer of Stop the War Coalition and author of ˜Imperialism and Resistance"

The outbreak of war in Georgia is already a disaster for the people of theregion. It risks being turned into a still broader problem by Dick Cheney'sthreats. The conflict is in large measure the product of George Bush's policy of US global hegemony, in the Caucasus as in the Middle East. Attempts to extend NATO eastwards, specifically incorporating Georgia, directly challengeRussian interests. Please come to the meeting to discuss this latest flashpoint in an increasingly dangerous world and forward this message to your contacts.

Adam Johannes


Why not ask them?
 
I would understand the argumennt that as there is no UK involvement then there is little need for march's in uk- if it wasn't for all those marches in protest at the the israeli invasion of lebanon a couple of years ago- wrong sort of war- NO jews to blame, no Islamo fascists to cream their pants over.
The US was shipping weapons to Israel, including cluster bombs, via RAF Brize Norton, you muppet.
 
Yes, because the Russian and Georgian governments often make decisions based on a bunch of Brits marching up and down in the rain.
 
There is also the issue that when public awareness is confused about what is going on it is difficult to call a mass demonstration, the public meeting in London would hopefully provide a focus for action by arming people with an analysis and expanation of the situation

Already on other boards there has been debate about where would be an appropriate place for a demo:

Incidently I would not be in favour of a demonstration outside eiter of these embassies. To demonstrate outside the Russian embassy would be left cover for our own rulers aggressive expansionism in the region. To demonstrate outside the Georgian embassy would make it look like we were supporting the Russian military intervention. A demonstraton in central London against our rulers making the situation worse is where our responsibilities lie.
 
There is also the issue that when public awareness is confused about what is going on it is difficult to call a mass demonstration, the public meeting in London would hopefully provide a focus for action by arming people with an analysis and expanation of the situation

Already on other boards there has been debate about where would be an appropriate place for a demo:

Incidently I would not be in favour of a demonstration outside eiter of these embassies. To demonstrate outside the Russian embassy would be left cover for our own rulers aggressive expansionism in the region. To demonstrate outside the Georgian embassy would make it look like we were supporting the Russian military intervention. A demonstraton in central London against our rulers making the situation worse is where our responsibilities lie.

Oh, FFS! "What do we want? The British Government not to make things worse!"

How about NOT calling any demonstration until you have decided what you want?

Is there some odd Trotty sense that you just gotta have a march even if you've no fuckin idea what you're for, what you're against or what a good solution might be?

For once, I think I might almost prefer the simple peacenik types. At least they know what they want - everyone to stop being violent - even if they've no idea how to achieve it.
 
I think thats the first ever JHE post I've agreed with. No real aim to the demo, no real sense in my view that the UK is that involved in this outside of its relationship to Nato.
 
actally if the swp and most of the rest of the idiot m/c left had not gone hookline and sinker for the opportunistic idea that the wars in iraq and afghan are somehow an attack on islam,instead of being very very very simply one thing and one thing only, that is, wars for oil,

then in fact it would be totally legitimate to demonstate again, if mostly pointless but when did that stop a leftist demo??, against this new war as yet another imperialist war for oil
 
actally if the swp and most of the rest of the idiot m/c left had not gone hookline and sinker for the opportunistic idea that the wars in iraq and afghan are somehow an attack on islam,instead of being very very very simply one thing and one thing only, that is, wars for oil,

then in fact it would be totally legitimate to demonstate again, if mostly pointless but when did that stop a leftist demo??, against this new war as yet another imperialist war for oil

Where is the oil in Afghanistan?
 
Where is the oil in Afghanistan?

running through the pipeline that the Americans met with the Taliban to discuss building pre-9.11

the anti-war movement have never seen the war as a clash between islam and the west as durruti says, but rather that in order to wage war abroad the ruling class will whip up racism against muslims as the enemy of within. for the anti-war and working class movement to give an inch to racism against muslims would have been to cut its own throat - but durruit can't grasp that elementary point!
 
so salma yaqoob deserves to get spat at in the street?:confused:

I wouldn't want to see that even though I dislike her politics and the parties whe is associated with

However.......

Id quite like to see Galloway hanging from a lampost with a sign saying 'Traitor' round his neck though.
 
the anti-war movement have never seen the war as a clash between islam and the west as durruti says, but rather that in order to wage war abroad the ruling class will whip up racism against muslims as the enemy of within. for the anti-war and working class movement to give an inch to racism against muslims would have been to cut its own throat - but durruit can't grasp that elementary point!
just not true .. yes i totally believe all the swp top brass understand exactly that oil is the cause but utterly opportunistically they have hinted and talked of and used the idea of an attack on islam by the west to gain support ..

of course i understand and accpet that the state will try to whip up hatred of muslims .. ... they didn't do very well .. but by giving an inch or a milimetre to the idea that relegion is more than class or humanity you have fallen into an almighty trap .. YOU can defend muslims .. the BNP will defend whites .. well done you fell for the trap .. ;) mugs

( udo we have done this on here before .. you don't accept that the swp are deceitfully opportunistic .. almost everyone else does! :D )
 
depends what theyve done.

The vast majority do not deserve to Im sure. But I doubt soldiers are often spat at in the street, its very rare.

I think incidents of muslims being verbally, physically abused because they are muslims is A LOT more common then soldiers being physically or verbally abused because they are soldiers, and Id say that anyone who believes any different was either a right wing nut or an idiot that has been taken in by tabloid headlines.
 
Back
Top Bottom