This is like a backtrack, plus a sideways jog to the sideline.
his appeal is romantic
he won wars and wrote poems
there isn't an 'oh yeah but...'
that's the appeal
This is like a backtrack, plus a sideways jog to the sideline.
his appeal is romantic
he won wars and wrote poems
there isn't an 'oh yeah but...'
that's the appeal


The backtrack and jog is you saying he could have been a leader, but decided to go to the jungle and fight capitalism 'for the people'.
As it turns out, according to butchers, he tried to lead, was really crap at it, and sulked off to Bolivia to shoot some people.
Probably transferred aggression toward Fidel and Raul.

i suppose it could also confirm the theory that even if you do something amazing that at the end of the day you are just going to fail at something and then die![]()

I very much look forward to the day when they all get shot without judicial process after the revolution.![]()
Thats the spirit comrade.
When he was captured in Bolivia, how many locals were with him?
His homophobic and racist views, did he reject them at a later date?
His views, distasteful as they are, were of their time and culture. Using them as a stick to beat him with nearly 50 years after his death is, to put it mildly, disingenuous.
No he ain't you counter revo cocksucker.
Self-critique - NOW!
In the context of middle-class Argentina, where he "learned" those attitudes? Of course.What, talking of blacks and their penchant for not washing?
In North America, maybe. In most of the countries of South America though? Not so muchThat was racist even back then. And all the more surprising coming from the mouth of an 'egalitarian'.
What the fuck else do you expect from priests (besides fellatio if you're young and comely enough)?Sort of like priests back in the 1800s preaching brotherly love, but somehow finding a way to exclude slaves.
In the context of middle-class Argentina, where he "learned" those attitudes? Of course.
What the fuck else do you expect from priests (besides fellatio if you're young and comely enough)?

He was able to see through the myths and fantasies of capitalism, which also surrounded him. Why can we not expect him to also be able to see through the myths and fantasies of racial stereotyping?
Why write ´campesino´ when we have perfectly good English words to say the same thing? Unless the foreign word has an untranslatable meaning, using it is pretentious)
And they like fucking dolphins. The dolphin fuckers.

i did my best to put che guevara's appeal to people who don't read books
he did write some good poems, and he won some wars
against gangsters to boot
you could put him in the tradition of folk heroes
his appeal is romantic
he won wars and wrote poems
there isn't an 'oh yeah but...'
that's the appeal
"Lo Siento" - that's pretentious when there is a perfectly good english word to use![]()

Of course there's an 'Oh yeah but...'. There always is. Or is he somehow above any criticism?
I don't know much about the man at all, I keep meaning to reading some books about him, but to suggest that his faults should be overlooked because he "won wars and wrote poems" is nothing short of ridiculous.
Fair point. Both horrible bastards but they won wars.
Che Guevara was prettier though, which is why he sells more posters.
same as the international brigaders - people like the idea of idealists going off to fight for a cause, even if the reality of it is sometimes inconvenient.
(incidentally, why do these threads become excuses for inexplicable spanglishisms? Why write ´campesino´ when we have perfectly good English words to say the same thing? Unless the foreign word has an untranslatable meaning, using it is pretentious)
"Lo Siento" - that's pretentious when there is a perfectly good english word to use![]()
