Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
i don't want any genetically modified food either...

Do you think if you ate a tumour, that you'd get a tumour?
i don't want any genetically modified food either...

You're so thick sometimes Johnny. Concerns over GM food have nothing to do with people thinking they absorb the DNA from food.
Do you think if you ate a tumour, that you'd get a tumour?

Do you think if you ate a tumour, that you'd get a tumour?
You're so thick sometimes Johnny. Concerns over GM food have nothing to do with people thinking they absorb the DNA from food.
There are many problems with GM. A lot stem from the fact that every new GM organism is unique - it's not a technology that can be declared safe, it has to be assessed case by case. Some modifications can make an organism directly or indirectly harmful (poisonous to humans or to the environment). There are concerns that the length and type of testing is insufficient at the present time. Other concerns include doubts about the benefits to farmers and the need for them to buy their seed every year from the GM companies.
You're so thick sometimes Johnny. Concerns over GM food have nothing to do with people thinking they absorb the DNA from food.
There are many problems with GM. A lot stem from the fact that every new GM organism is unique - it's not a technology that can be declared safe, it has to be assessed case by case. Some modifications can make an organism directly or indirectly harmful (poisonous to humans or to the environment). There are concerns that the length and type of testing is insufficient at the present time. Other concerns include doubts about the benefits to farmers and the need for them to buy their seed every year from the GM companies.
Exactly. we dont know enough about the effects yet.
You agree that there's lots wrong with GM technology but think that people are foolish not to want to eat GM food?I agree that there's lots wrong with GM technology, but lots of people are afraid to eat the stuff because it's gm, and that's foolish. On this thread, two people said they didn't want to eat gm food, and that's what I was responding to.
Do you recall the food irradiation debacle? Same thing. People were afraid to eat irradiated food. People can be such dummies sometimes.

You agree that there's lots wrong with GM technology but think that people are foolish not to want to eat GM food?
You're such a fucking fraud.![]()
What makes you think that their objections are purely on safety grounds? Do they not have a right to decide what they eat? GM from the US is not labelled - and it's getting increasingly difficult to work out what's GM from places like India and China (source). US rice exports were halted for years due to cross-contamination with an unapproved GM rice strain - we have no idea how frequently that occurs or how often it is detected and dealt with properly. It's entirely reasonable to say that you won't touch GM food produced in such a poorly regulated and overly-commercialised environment where the producers have won the right not to reveal what it is they're selling.And you're apparently a moron who either can't read, or can't comprehend what you're reading.
GM technology is most likely of concern wrt the biosphere, concerning its intra-species genetic effects, etc. It seems to be designed to take away the power of farmers to use 'natural' means to sustain their crops, etc.
Yes, there are good political reasons to oppose GM foods, but that doesn't make it biologically harmful for an individual to ingest gm food.
I agree that there's lots wrong with GM technology, but lots of people are afraid to eat the stuff because it's gm, and that's foolish. On this thread, two people said they didn't want to eat gm food, and that's what I was responding to.


What makes you think that their objections are purely on safety grounds? .
And what on earth makes you think all approved GM food is safe for consumption? GM technology hasn't been around long enough to know that; large-scale long-term human testing has not been done. Your faith in the regulatory authorities is touching, but it's a tad naive.
.
Well, that may or may not be foolish, but as ever you have imagined things, and then put them into others' mouths. I certainly did not say i was afraid to eat the stuff, and i couldn't see frogw saying this either.
When you read what they do to raise cattle, then how they kill them, and how it kills and maims the workers slaughtering them, then it would be a wonder if anybody accepted american beef.
What did you say, then?
And when did you start speaking for fw?
Is Britain a kinder, gentler fast food nation to its food animals? That seems to contradict what hipipol just said about Matthews and chickens.
Is Britain a kinder, gentler fast food nation to its food animals? That seems to contradict what hipipol just said about Matthews and chickens.
And i'll answer this post in a second way now.
You pose a question that comes out of your fertile imagination. You then make the leap that the answer is 'no', and then you berate that person for saying this 'no' and therefore contradicting what somebody else said.
It's unreal! You're having conversations with yourself it seems to me.
Let's put it another way.
You push a question onto me. Then you answer it on my behalf. Then you tell me i'm contradicting, not myself, but somebody else.
Amazing.

No, you're getting all uppity about bad american food, but from what I read, it sounds like Bernard Matthews is just as bad.
Have you cut yourself off from british food as well?
I guess the question is, are you some sort of bigot and hypocrite?![]()