Whilst this is true, it doesn't stop them gladly rubbing the working classes noses in the middle classes petty authority.icepick said:It's balls, "middle class" people work shit dead-end jobs same as everyone else, and live on the same small planet being fucked up by capital. Some "m/c" people oppose it for the same reasons everyone else does.
When you become "management" do you automatically become middle-class?poster342002 said:Whilst this is true, it doesn't stop them gladly rubbing the working classes noses in the middle classes petty authority.
I think the answer to that is yes.Magneze said:When you become "management" do you automatically become middle-class?
Yes I know. For many on here it is just an insult against people playing at radical politics.mattkidd12 said:Could somebody tell me what you mean by 'middle-class'? Different people seem to have different definitions of it.
I don't think they are. I think they fully expect to maintain those priveledges afterwards. They want the upper classes off their backs, but want to remain on ours.scawenb said:I don't think it is just a matter of individuals but that many are fighting for a society which would remove their priveledged position which I think is an intersting phenomenon.
Why?poster342002 said:I think the answer to that is yes.
Magneze said:Why?
You're just making arbitrary class divide decisions aren't you?
Indeed.mattkidd12 said:Because they have a certain amount of power over other working class individuals.
Wouldn't Michael Albert call them the 'co-ordinator' class?poster342002 said:Indeed.
Interesting, it's that simple you think?mattkidd12 said:Because they have a certain amount of power over other working class individuals.
I've often used the term "quasi-bourgeois" to describe this group.mattkidd12 said:Wouldn't Michael Albert call them the 'co-ordinator' class?
Well I don't think they'd be on the same relative salary and for many to live outside the communities they serve.mattkidd12 said:Some people claim teacher's are 'middle-class'. But they would not lose their 'priveleged position' in a socialist society. It could be the case that they would have more control over their job.
I don't see why we'd have to work harder for less. Hopefully we'd be abolishing work all together.scawenb said:in any future society would expect to work harder for less.
LOL, yeah everything would just "happen" ...Thora said:I don't see why we'd have to work harder for less. Hopefully we'd be abolishing work all together.
I wish this too!I'm not saying everything would just happen, but the vast majority of work we do now is totally unnecessary. Bob Black's The abolition of work is worth reading I believe.Magneze said:LOL, yeah everything would just "happen" ...I wish this too!
*starts to daydream*
No one should ever work.
Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world. Almost any evil you'd care to name comes from working or from living in a world designed for work. In order to stop suffering, we have to stop working.

Then it wouldn't be work, it would be play. And that would be goodmattkidd12 said:What if work becomes fun? I sometimes enjoy doing work.

Thora for Prime Minister!Thora said:Then it wouldn't be work, it would be play. And that would be good![]()
Woohoo! Oh, wait, no - I reject power and hierarchy and all thatMagneze said:Thora for Prime Minister!

Thora said:Woohoo! Oh, wait, no - I reject power and hierarchy and all that![]()

No - we're going to have to shoot a lot of people in the face to get therescawenb said:I love the middle class fantasy that the badness and wickedness of capitalism could just be stopped over-night and we all live in a perfect world. Perhaps they could even convince the bourgoeisie and then there wouldn't even be the nastyness and disruption of the change-over.
Do let me know whan you've managed it as I'm sure we'd all love to join you. In the meantime.....

With water?Thora said:No - we're going to have to shoot a lot of people in the face to get there![]()
