Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why do people from privileged class backgrounds often misidentify their origins as working class?

brogdale

Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
Some gems in this BSA/ LSE paper:

We would therefore argue that these intergenerational understandings of class origin should also be read as having a performativedimension; as deflecting attention away from the structural privilege these individuals enjoy, both in their own eyes but also among those they communicate their ‘origin story’ to in everyday life.

It is also important to note that such misidentification is notably higher in two of our occupational case studies – acting and television (24 of 36 interviews). This is not coincidental; there is arguably a particular symbolic market for downplaying class privilege in these professions. Not only are these arenas disproportionately dominated by the privileged and class inequality an increasingly fiercely debated topic, but the uncertain and precarious nature of the work itself – often freelance, short-term, poorly paid, extremely competitive and reliant on informal networks – tilts career progression particularly in favour of those insulated by the ‘bank of mum and dad’

Any 'working class' folk got a view? :D
 
Interesting take.
What particular aspects of the paper drew you to that view?
I assume he's referring to this article which points at the paper.


It's an entirely identity-based take on class, with fuck all structural analysis on e.g. a Marxist basis.

Suprisingly, the comments on the Facebook Graun post were actually quite good at pointing this out to people.
 
Define membership of the "working class" income?, employment type?, wearing a flat cap and calling everyone luv? having a strong northern accent?

This, so much. I never went to Uni and have never worked a "professional" job, but if I go anywhere north of Birmingham I get called "posh" because of my accent. I know that I'm a proletarian in the Marxist sense, but that's not the definition the media uses.
 
There's lots of twittering about it. Largely, and superficially, as "identity". Haven't read the paper yet, not the subsequent arguments though.
 
There's lots of twittering about it. Largely, and superficially, as "identity". Haven't read the paper yet, not the subsequent arguments though.
I think some of the academic traction is derived from the fairly self-referential (disciplinary) nature of conclusions like this:

This concept, we have shown, helps us understand that many Britons understand their class origins, and sense of self, as constituted in ways that elide the conventional conceptual lens of sociologists.
 
Upper and middle classas are an annoyance within the working class movement. They are the problem. seem to spend a lot of time debating what class is in a transparent attempt to muddy waters ...see theory section .

Also they hate being called out on their privileged university warped neo-liberal perspective ... which is why I do it consistently.

Ok bit of a broad brush . As long as they check their obvious privalidge they are ok.
 
Apparently the categories used are "employers, managers, professionals and higher supervisors (who may be regarded as the middle class), intermediate, small employers, own account workers, lower supervisory and lower technical workers (intermediate class) and routine and semi-routine workers (working class)." There doesn't seem to be much information given about how those categories are defined - is a nurse routine, semi-routine, lower technical or a professional? Oh, and they add that "working class occupations are usually thought to amount nowadays to only around a quarter of the population..., 60% still claim to be ‘working class’ when asked to express a class identity." So it seems like some of this is the study authors complaining that there are still too many people claiming to be working class when it should only be a quarter of the population.
There's a Principal Skinner meme to be had there - "am I so out of touch? No, it's the people identifying as working class who are wrong."
"Those who identify as working class are more likely than those who identify as middle class to say that there is a wide divide between social classes (82% compared with 70%). People who see society as divided between a large disadvantaged group and a small privileged elite feel more working class regardless of their actual class position." is another key finding - seems like them complaining about the fact that some people still have a structural/antagonistic class analysis.

EDIT: Oh wait lol that's what I get for following Guardian links - I was reading and responding to this Evans/Mellon British Social Attitudes study, which is linked in the Guardian article above, but seems to be a totally different piece of research to the Friedman/O'Brien/McDonald LSE study in the OP.
 
Back
Top Bottom