My parents. It wasn't always a matter of inspiration either - they deliberately didn't get a telly til I was 14, thus forcing me to read loads 





Don't see reading the classics as being a sign of "intellectual well being", some I just don't get, others I have read because at the start I just though I should and they ended up being a great, enriching experience. Just like with contemporary books, some are good and bad, so are the 'classics'. Sometimes it starts as a snobby, 'Anna Karenina' or 'Atlas Shrugged' kind of thing, but when you apply your own personal taste to the classics just like any other book, it is very rewarding!gentlegreen said:reading ?
fiction ?
written on paper ?
Books were useful in the days before the Internet.
My mum trained as a primary teacher. She taught me to read by the time I was 5. My reading age was off the scale by 8. I reckon she thought that was the "be all, and end all" of parenting.
In a sense, you could say that my motivation to read was as a substitute for the parental involvement I lacked.
The only fiction I read in the past 30 years was Douglas Adams / William Gibson.
Fiction is a celebration of the complex human experience I can't relate to and is far too painful. As a kid I gravitated towards trashy stuff - Enid Blyton, Conan Doyle, Agatha Christie.
Personally I see reading "great" literature as being overrated as an index of intellectual well-being. Others would place an appreciation of fine art, opera or classical ballet up there too.
My last girlfriend tried to persuade me to watch "Great Expectations" on TV.![]()
I'm sorry your experience started as one to make up for lack of parental involvment, that's a bit sad. But it doesn't always have to be that way!gentlegreen said:reading ?
fiction ?
written on paper ?
Books were useful in the days before the Internet.
My mum trained as a primary teacher. She taught me to read by the time I was 5. My reading age was off the scale by 8. I reckon she thought that was the "be all, and end all" of parenting.
In a sense, you could say that my motivation to read was as a substitute for the parental involvement I lacked.
The only fiction I read in the past 30 years was Douglas Adams / William Gibson.
Fiction is a celebration of the complex human experience I can't relate to and is far too painful. As a kid I gravitated towards trashy stuff - Enid Blyton, Conan Doyle, Agatha Christie.
Personally I see reading "great" literature as being overrated as an index of intellectual well-being. Others would place an appreciation of fine art, opera or classical ballet up there too.
My last girlfriend tried to persuade me to watch "Great Expectations" on TV.![]()

Absolutely... my bro loved Marvel comics and my parents always felt it was all good. I read his comics, too, and actually I picked up a lot of vocab from them. I recall it was from comics I first understood the word 'sentient', and I'm certain there were other words like that I picked up from them.scifisam said:I thought the OP was asking about reading, as in enjoying reading of any kind, not just highbrow literature.
RenegadeDog said:then in my teens I discovered the cheesy cod-tolkien type epics like Dragonlance etc...
I reread the first three books recently and was shocked at the many ways in which they are lame. But to my primary school self they were The Best Thing Ever.May Kasahara said:Another Dragonlance survivor eh?I reread the first three books recently and was shocked at the many ways in which they are lame. But to my primary school self they were The Best Thing Ever.