Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Who was worst Hitler or Churchill (as an artist).

Winston or Adolf


  • Total voters
    28

Sprocket.

Wrong Em Boyo!
In my opinion both were obviously capable amateurs. There is nothing to make either stand out as better than the other.
 

Spymaster

Cockney Wanker
In my opinion both were obviously capable amateurs. There is nothing to make either stand out as better than the other.
You reckon? Going by the pics in the OP I'd put Adolf way ahead. Loads more detail and perhaps a very low professional standard. I reckon I could knock up something of about the same quality as the Churchill offering.
 
Last edited:

Sprocket.

Wrong Em Boyo!
You reckon? Going by the pics in the OP I'd put Adolf way ahead. Loads more detail and perhaps a low professional standard. I reckon I could knock up something of about the same quality as the Churchill offering.
Me too, regarding the Churchill sample.
Hitler’s looks more technical than artistic. As a illustration of his eye for detail he obviously had the better technique, though he probably was a bit more intense mentally.
 

mauvais

change has become unavoidable
Churchill's one is better IMO. Easier to replicate technical/architectural detail than to convey warmth.
 

passenger

up and down...
There was a painting of Churchills on fack or fortune I thought his art
was rather good.
 
Last edited:

quimcunx

protestant traybake
They are both better than anything i could do. I prefer Churchill's style/mood although the house jars and ruins it for me. Hitlers is technically proficient but dreary and not in a good way. The bottom third ruins it for me.
 

RubyToogood

can't remember what goes here
I like the Churchill ones. They're looser and more imaginative in their use of colour than I would have expected and there's some gusto there.

Hitler's are a bit A level and there's something unpleasantly not quite right about them, like he draws all the lines straight and whole from beginning to end.
 
Top