Kid_Eternity
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Ledger, all the others aren't even worth considering...
Democracy triumphs.

i don't agree with that at allNicholson was just playing Nicholson, no real attempt to create a character, whilst it's pretty apparent the lengths Ledger went to in order to play the character.
God help me, I'm actually finding DC's arguments quite convincing.

indeedJack Nicholson really made the role his own when he ponced about with a beatbox on his shoulder spraying up the paintings in that gallery. I still shudder when I think of that...
he had NO joker laugh and he wasn't funny at all. nicholson had all that shit AND he came off as an asshole too...Ledgers laugh was crap tho
I hate to run with the herd on this one, but Ledger made his own Joker.
personally i thought his rendition was uninspired and flat...teh joker is supposed to joke around and shit...i didn't see Ledger joke around too much, all he did was kill people. he went way too much to the dark side with his "portrayal"
How much of any of this is down to Ledger, though (or Nicholson, for that matter) and how much is down to the director?personally i thought his rendition was uninspired and flat...teh joker is supposed to joke around and shit...i didn't see Ledger joke around too much, all he did was kill people. he went way too much to the dark side with his "portrayal"
24%.How much of any of this is down to Ledger, though (or Nicholson, for that matter) and how much is down to the director?
How much of any of this is down to Ledger, though (or Nicholson, for that matter) and how much is down to the director?
I wasn't asking what the process was. I know that is how a film is made. I was pointing out that within those parameters, it may be that the whole "dark joker" thing is *entirely* the decision of the director, with Ledger only operating within very narrow boundaries. Or it might be that the director gave Ledger free rein. You can't really praise or blame the actor without knowing how much of it was up to him in the first place.well the screenplay is written then the director films it the way he interprets it and then tells the actors what to do and then within those guidelines the actor/actress plays the role how they see it...
its all very nebulous
I think he was very influenced by the Joker from the graphic novel The Killing Joke. Which, being Moore, was fucking ace

I wasn't asking what the process was. I know that is how a film is made. I was pointing out that within those parameters, it may be that the whole "dark joker" thing is *entirely* the decision of the director, with Ledger only operating within very narrow boundaries. Or it might be that the director gave Ledger free rein. You can't really praise or blame the actor without knowing how much of it was up to him in the first place.
- that nurses outfit will go down in history.
I hate to run with the herd on this one, but Ledger made his own Joker. Definetly exemplified the darker edge of hilarity and madness for me. I think he was very influenced by the Joker from the graphic novel The Killing Joke. Which, being Moore, was fucking ace
While I enjoy all three performances in their own way, Ledgers Joker was truer to the original intent of the character's creators.
i don't thing the joker was meant to be that mean and scary and ruthless. he was supposed to be bad and a criminal but in a funny sort of way which was exactly what nicholson captured on screen...
i don't thing the joker was meant to be that mean and scary and ruthless.

about it all.have you read the killing joke ? going sane ? the jokers last laugh?
love and madness? or any of the more recent adaptations of the joker ?