It's called fiction. Songs are stories. It is permissable to tell any tale within the context of a story.
I've already made a similar point: I gave as an example people who might say Roots is racist and shouldn't be shown because it depicts racism. I've also said Tommy dealing with child abuse is perfectly legitimate. And yes, I know stories have nasty characters. I'm not arguing for everything to be blanded out. (Although I'd be very happy if Jethro Tull were erased from existence).
I can watch This Is England; I can watch American History X. And so on. That isn't the point I'm making.
Whether or not you like the subject of the story is irrelevant.
I don't agree with that; I'd say it was relevant to the reader/listener whether they liked the subject, and more precisely whether they liked how it was handled.
However, that's besides the point. I'm specifically discussing the live version because (as I've said several times now) of the on stage banter; this gives a different perspective. Daltry's exposition, and the stage whisper comments from Moon, mean that aspects of the plot of the 'mini opera' are no longer something they can been seen as neutral retellers of.
I never said it was funny - I said I saw it in context, and I accept it for what it was - 2 bored, rich, drunk twats doing something they thought was funny.
I'm not accusing you of finding it funny; I was giving my own opinion of it. Yes, I see it in context too. And the context is they were being dicks.
It was slightly before my time (I was around, but too young), however in my time, I remember Sid Vicious's similar antics. I was and am a fan of the Sex Pistols, but I didn't think Sid going through the Jewish Quarter in a swastika T shirt was edgy, clever, or rebellious; I thought at the time, as I do now, that he was being a stupid fucking prick.