Scotland won't become independent until 2016
Just a nitpick, but that's the SNP's expected timeline. England could in theory cut Scotland free the day after the referendum.
Scotland won't become independent until 2016
England (sic) can do no such thing you monstrous idiot.Just a nitpick, but that's the SNP's expected timeline. England could in theory cut Scotland free the day after the referendum.
Or a coalition, to avoid the VoNC that is the only way to dissolve a fixed term parliament.
You haven't been paying attention.Why should there be a fixed term parliament? We've only got one ATM because of the Con LibDem coalition agreement, they haven't changed the electoral system to make them obligatory for all time, have they?
Surely the power to dissolve parliament and call an election will belong to whoever is PM, unless I really haven't been paying attention.
You haven't been paying attention.
It's the legal set up now, yes.So we do now have fixed term parliaments as an obligatory thing?
I'm looking forward to seeing how shrilly the media push "you have a duty to use your vote" this time around. I suspect it'll be a fair bit shriller than last time, as the parties struggle to replace the veneer of democracy their politics had, and which their actions post-"credit crunch" have caused to peel off.
It's the legal set up now, yes.
at self.How could you have one-off fixed date election? It's possible i suppose...but...you know the lib-dems are now bad right?I stand corrected then. I thought/assumed it was just a one off.at self.
That's actually quite a significant change, but obviously old news to everyone but me.
So we do now have fixed term parliaments as an obligatory thing?
You mean parliament can change laws? We learn as we walk.For the moment, however there's a principle that no parliament can bind a future parliament so they could easily set it aside.
How could you have one-off fixed date election? It's possible i suppose...but...you know the lib-dems are now bad right?
Yep.My understanding was that they'd agreed as part of the coalition deal that this parliament would be ther full five years, to prevent Cameron from having the ability to call a snap election when he thought it would be to his advantage.
Quite how that would work legally/constitutionally I don't pretend to know. If it is instead how you say it is, I'm surprised there wasn't more made of it, because it removes one of the significant powers the PM has traditionally had.
So was it a long term aim of the LibDems rather than just a short term way of forming a coalition?
Yep.