Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Who do you vote for in 2015 General Election?

Or a coalition, to avoid the VoNC that is the only way to dissolve a fixed term parliament.

Why should there be a fixed term parliament? We've only got one ATM because of the Con LibDem coalition agreement, they haven't changed the electoral system to make them obligatory for all time, have they?

Surely the power to dissolve parliament and call an election will belong to whoever is PM, unless I really haven't been paying attention.
 
Why should there be a fixed term parliament? We've only got one ATM because of the Con LibDem coalition agreement, they haven't changed the electoral system to make them obligatory for all time, have they?

Surely the power to dissolve parliament and call an election will belong to whoever is PM, unless I really haven't been paying attention.
You haven't been paying attention.
 
I'm looking forward to seeing how shrilly the media push "you have a duty to use your vote" this time around. I suspect it'll be a fair bit shriller than last time, as the parties struggle to replace the veneer of democracy their politics had, and which their actions post-"credit crunch" have caused to peel off.

Yes, so fuck 'em all.

Any spoilt vote, however witty, is just a vote that the voter was too simple to cast correctly. Gives them the idea that the proles will accept any shite handed down if they can't even put a cross in a box.

Voting changes fuck all, so why bother playing their game and giving them legitimacy?
 
I stand corrected then. I thought/assumed it was just a one off. :facepalm: at self.

That's actually quite a significant change, but obviously old news to everyone but me.
How could you have one-off fixed date election? It's possible i suppose...but...you know the lib-dems are now bad right?
 
How could you have one-off fixed date election? It's possible i suppose...but...you know the lib-dems are now bad right?

My understanding was that they'd agreed as part of the coalition deal that this parliament would be ther full five years, to prevent Cameron from having the ability to call a snap election when he thought it would be to his advantage.

Quite how that would work legally/constitutionally I don't pretend to know. If it is instead how you say it is, I'm surprised there wasn't more made of it, because it removes one of the significant powers the PM has traditionally had.

So was it a long term aim of the LibDems rather than just a short term way of forming a coalition?
 
My understanding was that they'd agreed as part of the coalition deal that this parliament would be ther full five years, to prevent Cameron from having the ability to call a snap election when he thought it would be to his advantage.

Quite how that would work legally/constitutionally I don't pretend to know. If it is instead how you say it is, I'm surprised there wasn't more made of it, because it removes one of the significant powers the PM has traditionally had.

So was it a long term aim of the LibDems rather than just a short term way of forming a coalition?
Yep.
 
His support was based on pre-govt cycles of electoral opposition and so vote getting - now, post-govt, it's only going to hammer them. Another thing they got wrong. They're getting wiped out. The murdering cunts.
 
Worthy of a bump. People talked about tactical voting at the last election; in hindsight, I am assuming it did not work then. I know wisend wrinklies who vote tactically and I know people that don't vote for who they believe in, because they have no chance of being elected either locally or nationally.
In hindsight, did people vote tactically and have they learnt their lesson or will they be voting tactically again?
 
Back
Top Bottom