Pete the Greek said:keep calling me out you thick motherfucker and I'll seek your ignominious hounding from these boards, you pathetic fucktard.
i guess you mean UAF?MC5 said:Nothing in that poll about those who waste their time feeding BNP delusions of importance.![]()
durruti02 said:i guess you mean UAF?
Ah.... someone else who's really densedurruti02 said:i guess you mean UAF?
Hah... Said it all along... And I'll be honest, where I grew up people employ Poles because they will work hard for low wages doing monotonous jobs that a lot of Brits wouldn't. I don't know if it is like that anywhere else.Brainaddict said:I haven't joined any of these bloody immigration debates yet, so thought I'd give my tuppenceworth. Working class politics has usually aspired to be international in its vision, and I find it very, very odd that in an age of increasing corporate globalisation anyone who had the interests of the working class at heart could possibly encourage parochial politics.
For instance I would guess that most unemployment in this country in recent years has been created not by workers coming here, but by corporations moving jobs overseas. The very reason that corporations are so strong at the moment is that they have a global reach, while the systems designed to constrain them (ranging from govt regulation through trade unions) are *not* global.
I mean, if you kept the Poles in Poland, and the unemployment there kept labour costs low, companies would just start leaving Britain for Poland. Which would leave the parochialists here looking pretty damn stupid. And unemployed, with any luck
It seems to me the key to fighting corporate power lies in creating ever larger global movements and organisations. So this 'me and mine' politics of durutti and the like is so backward-looking and stuck in the past that I keep looking for the bloody time machine they stepped out of. They seem to have no awareness of what is actually happening in the world. If such a thing as 'the working class' exists, it can only be a global working class, and their interests must in the long run - even if not in the short term - be aligned.
Paris Garters said:Erm...the scabs are the people who employ immigrant workers because they know that due to the relative poverty of their country of origin, they will accept shit conditions and low wages, thereby enabling the increase of the bosses' profit margins?
The employment of immigrant workers is driving down wages in some areas, and it's not always the case of 'shit jobs that no british people will do'. But it isn't immigrants themselves that are the problem, It's those who exploit them.
The only way to resolve it that i can see is greater solidarity between british and immigrant workers to ensure that everyone gets a decent wage for doing the same job.
Brainaddict said:I haven't joined any of these bloody immigration debates yet, so thought I'd give my tuppenceworth. Working class politics has usually aspired to be international in its vision, and I find it very, very odd that in an age of increasing corporate globalisation anyone who had the interests of the working class at heart could possibly encourage parochial politics.
For instance I would guess that most unemployment in this country in recent years has been created not by workers coming here, but by corporations moving jobs overseas. The very reason that corporations are so strong at the moment is that they have a global reach, while the systems designed to constrain them (ranging from govt regulation through trade unions) are *not* global.
I mean, if you kept the Poles in Poland, and the unemployment there kept labour costs low, companies would just start leaving Britain for Poland. Which would leave the parochialists here looking pretty damn stupid. And unemployed, with any luck
It seems to me the key to fighting corporate power lies in creating ever larger global movements and organisations. So this 'me and mine' politics of durutti and the like is so backward-looking and stuck in the past that I keep looking for the bloody time machine they stepped out of. They seem to have no awareness of what is actually happening in the world. If such a thing as 'the working class' exists, it can only be a global working class, and their interests must in the long run - even if not in the short term - be aligned.
Paris Garters said:Erm...the scabs are the people who employ immigrant workers because they know that due to the relative poverty of their country of origin, they will accept shit conditions and low wages, thereby enabling the increase of the bosses' profit margins?
The employment of immigrant workers is driving down wages in some areas, and it's not always the case of 'shit jobs that no british people will do'. But it isn't immigrants themselves that are the problem, It's those who exploit them.
The only way to resolve it that i can see is greater solidarity between british and immigrant workers to ensure that everyone gets a decent wage for doing the same job.
Maybe you shouldn't misquote me. I know a lot of Brits who will not clean toilets, work on factory lines ect. I'm sure you do too... Then they complain about immigrants taking their jobs whereas they're the ones being fussy (and for the record, I've cleaned toilets and worked in fast food restaurants before somebody pulls the social class card).Paris Garters said:Erm...the scabs are the people who employ immigrant workers because they know that due to the relative poverty of their country of origin, they will accept shit conditions and low wages, thereby enabling the increase of the bosses' profit margins?
The employment of immigrant workers is driving down wages in some areas, and it's not always the case of 'shit jobs that no british people will do'. But it isn't immigrants themselves that are the problem, It's those who exploit them.
The only way to resolve it that i can see is greater solidarity between british and immigrant workers to ensure that everyone gets a decent wage for doing the same job.
nwnm said:because it stops the 'race to the bottom' in wages and starts to ratchet pay and conditions upwards. Its also why you see the growth of militant trade unionism in (formerly downtrodden) sections of the working class, in what used to be called the southeast asian tiger economies. Now thats what I call internationalism.
nwnm said:Against that old stalinist horseshit.
I dunno why you're angry with that troll - you're two sides of the same coinPete the Greek said:keep calling me out you thick motherfucker and I'll seek your ignominious hounding from these boards, you pathetic fucktard.
tbaldwin said:Are you an Anarchist?
nwnm said:because the old style CP used to be in favour of them <along with some of their fellow travellers on the labour left in the 1970's>
nwnm said:These might save a bit of time if we're getting into 20 questions -
http://www.swp.org.uk/where.php
http://www.swp.org.uk/where.php#barker
BTW as you're so interested in everyone elses political trajectory, what party are you a member of? what's your political history? What are your beliefs?
tbaldwin said:None...
Various....
Socialism from Below.
nwnm said:elaborate
Red Jezza said:I dunno why you're angry with that troll - you're two sides of the same coin