Simply the best!
Combat 16 Arthur Fowler
Combat 16 Arthur Fowler
jackwupton said:Didn't they bump him off?
Jealous of the competition, I guess.
butchersapron said:Nah, it's not on line as far as i know. The interesting thing is that they did start off as (formally) apolitical self-defence organisations, largely set up by the middle-to-large-farmers to protect their trade/produce, but that the rank-and-file landless labourers grew in influence and often ended up running the things on their own terms - and often under the direct influence of the more radical groups around at that time but without alligning themselves with them openly. Opposition to the land steals going on, the removal of peasants from their own land to make way for sheep, rises in the price and shortening of the lengths of leases etc were all brought into question.The problem is that the larger farmers words/proclaimations/etc is all that's been recorded and so it's been easy to write them off. A lot of those resentments actually resurfaced in the 1685 rebellion (and the huge growth in the sects in the following half century) - but in the classic guise of support for 'the good tsar'.
I'd guess like anything hastily formed group in a time of civil war,social disruption and heightened political awareness that they were a mixture of things - some clearly progressive and and some not so - and it would be unfair to expect of them anything else in those conditions.
Yes, that would be a good comparison i think.Idris2002 said:Comparable to 18th century Irish groups like the Defenders or the Ribbonmen, then?
Think Slab could loan me a few now that's he retired?
fanta said:What a lamentable immature cunt you are sometimes.

mattkidd12 said:I though cockney said they had a few asian members?

Rajjie said:What, like me?![]()
Anarchist Infantry advancing Milicina Militia Woman standing with rifle