Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Which is the largest English city....

Argyle rule :)

I admit I'm no expert concerning football but can someone explain to me please why Liverpool has two teams in the Premiership whilst Bristol, pretty much the same size, hasn't had one since 1980?

Biding our time... you wait!
 
it's not a town, neither is woolwich tbf, they are both areas in London

Bath is a fairly big place never to have had a league team (apart from when Rovers played there) is it the biggest city never to have had a league team?
Hastings? Pop: 86,000

The reason Bristol has crap teams is probably something to do with the popularity of Rugby in the South West.
 
My question was as much about Liverpool as Bristol. Anyway, which one do you support, City or Rovers?
 
True. If you asked what is the biggest city never to have a top flight rugby team, I reckon the answer would be a larger place! birmingham? manchester? - dont know much about rugger!
 
bristol city (don't tell jtg) played several seasons in division one (old school) in the late 70s
I think more puzzling is the absence of Leeds from the top division for long periods. One of the largest cities in Britain, and a large support for football, yet they've spent almost half of the last 25 years out of the first division.
 
Hastings? Pop: 86,000

The reason Bristol has crap teams is probably something to do with the popularity of Rugby in the South West.
Or the fact that Bristol is two small to support two elite teams and sgould have done the sensible thing and amalgamated years ago!:D
 
Hastings? Pop: 86,000

The reason Bristol has crap teams is probably something to do with the popularity of Rugby in the South West.

Maybe, except that Rugby League is popular in Lancashire and that hasn't stopped either Manchester or Liverpool having teams in the Premiership.

I wouldn't say Bristol teams were crap btw, they're both reasonable but just not as good as they should be for a city with a half million population and loadsamoney (Bristol's loaded, I lived there back in the early '80s for a short while and lots of financial companies from the South East have relocated there).
 
What is the criterion for defining a City? It always used to be somewhere with a cathedral but this seems to have changed eg as far as I know Brighton & Hove has no cathedral.
 
On the London thing - Donna was saying last year that London didn't have any teams in the Prem, as only the City of London was London, so therefore, if one was arguing it from Donna's perspective, each area of london could be considered a city...
 
What is the criterion for defining a City? It always used to be somewhere with a cathedral but this seems to have changed eg as far as I know Brighton & Hove has no cathedral.

Has to be awarded by the sovereign. We are unique in this respect, everywhere else in the world its just a big town!
 
True. If you asked what is the biggest city never to have a top flight rugby team, I reckon the answer would be a larger place! birmingham? manchester? - dont know much about rugger!

Birmingham have Moseley a top flight club before the Zurich vame along.

I know that the largest conurbation never to field a first class rugby side in Wales is Barry.
 
What is the criterion for defining a City? It always used to be somewhere with a cathedral but this seems to have changed eg as far as I know Brighton & Hove has no cathedral.

A cathedral or a royal warrant is necessary IIRC. Plymouth's a city despite not having a cathedral (apart from the R C one).
 
Won't by Plymouth for long, Argyle are going up next year sure as eggs is eggs. With any luck they'll beat Newcastle in the playoff final :D
 
Won't by Plymouth for long, Argyle are going up next year sure as eggs is eggs. With any luck they'll beat Newcastle in the playoff final :D

Its NOT Plymouth at all tho. it will be when Wakefield get to the Prem and Plymouth are still waiting!!:D
 
A cathedral or a royal warrant is necessary IIRC. Plymouth's a city despite not having a cathedral (apart from the R C one).

Nottingham lacks for a cathedral also. The cathedral thing is a daft way to define a city, based on that you've got pisspot little barely-even-a-place-never-mind-a-city towns like Ripon and Bangor which are technically cities.
 
Nottingham lacks for a cathedral also. The cathedral thing is a daft way to define a city, based on that you've got pisspot little barely-even-a-place-never-mind-a-city towns like Ripon and Bangor which are technically cities.

it can be having an Abbey or a University, that's how Bath got the city gig
 
Its NOT Plymouth at all tho. it will be when Wakefield get to the Prem and Plymouth are still waiting!!:D
The population of Wakefield is only 70,000. The figure of 300,000 is the population of something called Wakefield city district, which includes totally separate towns such as Castleford and Featherstone.
 
I always thought an abbey or cathedral made a settlement a city.

I remember a few places applying to be made cities a year or two ago. Can't remember where applied though. Possibly Reading, Preston, Swindon?

Leeds is a big city to only have one major league team. I mean Liverpool, Sheffield, Manchester, Bristol etc all have 2 teams in the league.
 
Ely, there's another blatantly-just-a-town-with-a-big-church. Someone needs to get the old city secateurs out and do some trimming.

St Davids has a population of less than 2000! and its a city due to its catherdral. Don't think St Davids FC have been in the Premier League for a while too
 
Evidently her majesty is not utterly devoid of taste :)

Hey, Northampton has some hidden beauties. A melancholy graveyard of nuns, just tucked away behind high street shops and takeaway joints. The brutal one fingered salute to the world they call the Express Lifts Tower. Crowned yearly by a christmas tree:cool:

I could go on. It's fucking old and once you know where to look there are plenty of reasons to like northampton.


Wellingborough on the other hand...
 
Back
Top Bottom