Orang Utan
Maybe I like the misery
That was two years ago - I bet they'd have trouble recruiting nowThere were conductors working on the routemasters up until their withdrawal a couple of years ago![]()
That was two years ago - I bet they'd have trouble recruiting nowThere were conductors working on the routemasters up until their withdrawal a couple of years ago![]()
That was two years ago - I bet they'd have trouble recruiting now

That was two years ago - I bet they'd have trouble recruiting now
Why?![]()
Cos of the wide public perception that public transport is a much more dangerous place to be now - high profile murders n that
Cos of the wide public perception that public transport is a much more dangerous place to be now - high profile murders n that
Can't you read? The proposed new Routemasters would be fully accessible for disabled people*. But are you really arguing that old people would prefer not to have a conductor onboard?
(*that's what we were told, so we have to run with that for now)
Right. So 'progress' involves producing a bus that is more dangerous to pedestrians and cyclists, prone to catching fire and easy for fare evaders?
With regards to the cameras, the original central zone cameras were only about 70% efficient at capturing your number plate. Penalty charge notices had to be checked in person. A very tedious job. New cameras are close to 100% efficient.
I'd be very surprised if they couldnt find any takers for conductors jobs tbh.
But I dont think the perception is any worse than it was a couple of years ago when they didnt appear to have nay problems recruiting conductors.
Thanks... found it. Apparently it was commissioned by Autocar
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7149722.stm
Seems a bit strange that a car magazine would want to provide better buses.

I agree. We do that already, though. We still have double deckers. But the Routemasters were phased out for a reason.



I'm all for disabled access but the routemasters actually suited me better. Lots of bus stops have been moved further apart because the buses don't fit (get in the way of traffic lights or some such) and I can't hop off at the lights anymore. I can walk but not far. Also the bendy buses give me travel sickness which I could generally avoid on all other buses if I controlled my reading urge.
I get slightly miffed at bendy buses being presented as the answer for all disabled people. As always we're a hell of a large group with a multitude of needs.
Actually. all my quibbles could be solved by buses driving with the doors open.![]()
So surely the Bendy buses are still better than double deckers when there's no space left on the lower deck? I don't think we're ever going to go back to buses with open access like that, though.So surely the Bendy buses are still better than double deckers when there's no space left on the lower deck?
I wonder why bendy buses give you travel sickness, and others don't?



I've never ever understood this. I drive, and I live just off the car-park known as the M6. Even with the toll section it can, and often does, take hours to get north of Manchester or east of Coventry. I would like less cars on the road so that when I need to drive I can actually drive rather than mindlessly shifting between 1st and 2nd gear for an unpredictable amount of time. Public transport gets cars off the road and gives me more options. As a sane motorist, what the fuck else would I want them to spend transport money on?![]()
I'm a cyclist - what's so terrifying about them? They're just like any vehicle - stay the fuck behind them and you'll be alright.
A little bit of London history, 120 miles up the M1:
![]()
![]()