el-ahrairah
forward communism, forward gerbils!
If it's not written down, it clearly doesn't exist.
If it's not written down, it clearly doesn't exist.
this is a good point.Just replace "jews" with "asians"
this is a good point.
Nope, a joke about Nazi rhetoric, actually!![]()

I'm quite annoyed with otherwise inteligent posters on here giving the BNP the benefit of the democracy doubt.
"Where does it say all these nasty things in their policies, though?"
Ah! yeah. They're ok nowadays because their website says so.
If it's not in the manifesto then they've changed. Like when abusers of women or children change their spots. The liberals love it.
Quote:
British National Party (BNP) chairman Nick Griffin has defended a party leaflet which says that black Britons and Asian Britons "do not exist".
The BNP's "Language and Concepts Discipline Manual" says the term used should be "racial foreigners". In a BBC interview, Mr Griffin said to call such people British was a sort of "bloodless genocide" because it denied indigenous people their own identity.
So British black and asian people don't exist?
Quote:
Raise the inheritance tax threshold to £1 million
Party of the workers?
Quote:
Deport two million immigrants
Quote:
Use electronically tagged chain gangs to build coastal defences
Quote:
Re-introduce grammar schools
Quote:
Re-introduce corporal punishment in schools
Quote:
Re-introduce Christian assemblies
Quote:
Introduce a system of workfare for the unemployed
Victorian workhouses?
Quote:
Abolish anti-discrimination laws
Quote:
The BNP has also denounced homosexuality as “form of behavioural deviancy” and “not a valid lifestyle choice”. Griffin claims the BNP speaks for “the majority of the population” who, he says, believe“homosexuality is wrong” and that it “needs to be pushed humanely but firmly back into the closet”. Griffin warns that if gays continue to “press their aims further” there will be an “almighty backlash” which will result in the imprisonment of all homosexuals.
Does this manifesto seems so different from the BNPs? Would it have given any idea of what the organisation who wrote it would actually do if they took power?
http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Dachau.../25Points.html
Most morris sides I know would kick out any BNP members. Their attempts to try and claim Morris as a cultural icon is offensive and has nothing to do with what is a working class folk traditionthats just boring racist toss fail
I'm sure there education and economic policy must hold some truly awesome laughs
compulsory morris dancing etc![]()
)yes thats all pretty nasty .. but where do get most of the above from? doesn't appear to be BNP policies at all .. where are you getting these from?
just a couple of examples re defining fascism .. war is a key one .. yet BNP policy appears to be very isolationist not expansionist .. another is state control yet BNP appear to be in favour of decentrailisation NOT centralisation " ..Power should be devolved to the lowest level possible so that local communities can make decisions which affect them.."
but the key is this from Tatchell " ..As well as the party’s long history of homophobia, BNP activists also stand accused racism, anti-Semitism, holocaust denia and Islamophobia. A disturbing number of past and present BNP members have criminal convictions for violence. Although the BNP has publicly ditched some of its most extreme and bigoted policies, many critics believe this make-over is just an astute public relations exercise designed to con people who were put off by its thuggish, macho neo-Nazi image. They say the BNP hasn’t changed at all; it has just got more professional and media savvy. Disguising its extremist views and donning sharp suits, its game-plan is to copy the tactics of successful European far right parties, such as the Front National in France, the Vlaams Blok in Belgium and the National Democratic Party in Germany.
Ex-BNP activist turned anti-fascist campaigner, Matthew Collins, is a Director of Searchlight’s Operation Wedge. He says the new-look BNP is all spin and PR. The party may have toned down its open racism, homophobia and street violence, but behind the smiling face of its leader Nick Griffin lurks the same old hateful bigotry. It hasn’t really changed its core values and aims."
to attack it simply on policy when as others have ponted out all the other parties support neo liberalism ( bnp opposed to a degree) invading oil countries ( bnp oppossed) privatisation ( bnp oppssed) shutting post offices ( bnp oppossed) cheap labour ( bnp oppossed) etc just does not work
sorry don't even know if the bnp are pro or anti Morris.
started this thread to find ammo to point out just how insane they really are.
there point there not really Nazi's (too ugly and no sense of style to be real Nazis and too cowardly as well don't see griffin leading a volunteer brigade to have a crack at the Taliban)
leaving there racist toss to one side
1) they want Ireland to rejoin the UK.
2) there in favor of handing out assualt rifles to the general public.
both ideas are monumentally crazy



fascists and commies are banned from joining the forces
Since when?
Communists served during the Second World War and did their National Service like anyone else, up to whenever Nat Service was abolished (early 1960s?).
what was the deal with Tom Winteringham then? thought he was a CP soldier ..There's been an unofficial bar to members of CPGB etc (which has probably been extended to cover the many grouplets in the interim) since the 1920s, but I'm not aware of a similar one (official or unofficial) against fascists.
yep u rightHe'd left by then i think, they were actually smearing him as a nazi-trotskyite..the usual...

Rule #1: The BNP is not a ‘racist’ or ‘racial’ or ‘racialist’ or ‘race-conscious’ or ‘white’ or ‘white- people’s’ party. It should never be referred to as such by BNP activists, and anyone else who does so must be politely but firmly corrected. The precisely correct description of what we are, in the standard terminology of international comparative politics, is an ‘ethno-nationalist’ party. That is, we espouse, like many political parties all over the world, the interests of the particular ethnic groups to which we belong. There is nothing fascistic or unusual about this, and we don’t have to apologise for it. If we must describe our attitude towards race, it is ‘racial realism,’ as no-one can admit being against realism.
Rule #9: The BNP strongly prefers the term ‘hard right’ to ‘far right,’ ‘extreme right,’ or ‘radical right.” ‘Hard’ implies moral seriousness and firmness of purpose. ‘Far’ and ‘extreme’ imply we are outside the spectrum of reasonable opinion. ‘Radical’ is acceptable when addressing a highly disaffected audience, especially when making ‘radical’ critiques of the present regime, but is otherwise to be used sparingly, lest
we sound like Marxist troublemakers. The best term of all is ‘patriotic right’, as opposed to ‘unpatriotic right’ or ‘globalist right’ (i.e the Tories).
Rule #13: When addressing a specific audience, arguments for our policies should always be couched in language calculated to be relevant to the interests of that audience. Do not bore a workingmen’s audience with those parts of our ideology that derive from old-school Toryism, or puzzle an affluent suburban audience with an explanation of worker ownership of industry. Equally, don’t deny that these other parts of our ideology exist; they are nothing to be ashamed of and will not alienate any true supporter.
Rule #14: Racial and ethnic epithets and insults should never be used. If you just want to make trouble, join the National Front or some other psychologically twisted, politically useless and sometimes criminal organisation.
Since when?
And yeah, the TA sounds great on that story.