fractionMan said:I want to get to the point of an Ian M Banks style techno utopia. AI runs everything perfectly, people live as long as they can be bothered.
Hey, that's my day job you've described...
fractionMan said:I want to get to the point of an Ian M Banks style techno utopia. AI runs everything perfectly, people live as long as they can be bothered.
Crispy said:I picked the nanobots, cos that would competely solve all the problems - when you can make anything out of anything else you're sorted.
Techno303 said:Lots of brass levers and ceramics. I’m thinking Jules Vern style or Dune. Mid 19th century to early 20th vision of a scientific super-age. It’s all about them brass levers.
kyser_soze said:How about the medieval agrairian lifestyle with IT and modern healthcare? All well and good having a rural existence but I'll be buggered if I'm going to die at 35 of some insidious disease.
That, and music, is why I picked present technology levels. I could easily live pre-Ford otherwise.onemonkey said:not many people will be happy to give up medical technology once they get a bit ill.
They may have looked 80, but they were probably 40.moon said:thats a myth,,,most people in the middle ages died well into their 80's.

moon said:thats a myth,,,most people in the middle ages died well into their 80's...good diet...exercise...no heart dissease...plenty of herbal remedies...etc.etc
brahaminda said:What happens is the figures get skewed by the huge number of infant deaths, pushing the average age down to 35-40.
fudgefactorfive said:Surely antibiotics are not dependent on most other technologies. If we'd stayed at base agriculture level for another few tens of thousands of years - far enough advanced to invent bread - we might well have discovered penicillin anyway.
moon said:thats a myth,,,most people in the middle ages died well into their 80's...good diet...exercise...no heart dissease...plenty of herbal remedies...etc.etc
brahaminda said:Not without centrifuges, microscopes, petri dishes etc...
fudgefactorfive said:Centrifuges and petri dishes, or equivalents, aren't outside the realms of primitive technology, surely. I agree that microscopes are a bit of a leap.
And now we have antibiotic-resistant superbugs. MRSA isn't exactly a barrel of laughs.
brahaminda said:No but the underlying assumptions of how they work ie gravity, microbiology etc are highly complex, and themselves rely on high technology.
The leap from mouldy bread to amoxicillin is quite big one in terms of world views, let alone technology
fudgefactorfive said:OK - work with me here because I'm ignorant on the topic - but while they are reliant on high technology in our world, is it at least possible (no matter how unlikely) that we could have had some form of apparently "primitive" but actually quite sophisticated society with a good understanding of biology, without absolutely all of the other lines of technology developing in the same way? We "understood" gravity before we had steam engines, no? (Yes, I'm aware we still don't really "understand" gravity.)
This sort of thing?Yossarian said:I'll take a cheat option : hunter-gatherer with a stereo.
Dammit! where are the other upper class facsists when you need them?dilute micro said:This is stupid. I'm the only one that picked late medieval/renaissance?