EastEnder
Brixton Barnacle
Is it guru meditating?Global_Stoner said:my Amiga still floating round somewhere.
Is it guru meditating?Global_Stoner said:my Amiga still floating round somewhere.
lobster said:Do you not think server based applications will not work on a "home" computer?
And also "home" applications will not work on a "server" computer?
If my understanding is accurate , the "home" and "server" names are just recomendations, what one actually uses its upto them.
I would be interested in tests to prove me otherwise, and i don't mean performance test (as i clearly understand there would be reasons for either type of computer), just tests to show only server apps can run on server computers and not home computers and that home apps only work on home computer and not server computers.
lobster said:...just tests to show only server apps can run on server computers and not home computers and that home apps only work on home computer and not server computers.
lobster said:My judgment is unrealistic, after all performance is one of the reasons for getting a server or home. At least we agree on that.

axon said:And the mighty beast...Gateway G6-200, 200 MHz, 32 MB RAM.
Iam said:If you're serving high-density user applications on a corporate WAN, you'd probably want something a bit more powerful.
I could be wrong and this may not be the point, of course.
Iam said:Unless it's ordered by some clueless IT management type, of course...![]()
