Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
i would put a tim hortons on every corner in the UK and then make plans for the rest of europe
Would they know what to do with actual good coffee and donuts?
i would put a tim hortons on every corner in the UK and then make plans for the rest of europe
Still none the wiser as to what your actual beliefs are!
Panic and ask people what they think I guess....

Proportional representation for the Westminster Parliament so that the people in there bear some relationship to the votes cast. Elections to be held annually.
The other important change is to make all taxation local. The taxes are locally levied and collected, at individual council ward or parish council level. There would be (i) an income tax on individuals (ii) corporation tax on companies (iii) tax on goods being brought into the ward or taken out of it.
Connected to this would be an absolute power of veto passed by the local council on any laws or policies decided by the county council or Westminster. The local councils can agree to band together and allocate money for facilities which serve wider than the individual ward level, for example a regional hospital or a secondary school. But if a policy they or their electors disagree with is being foisted on them, they have the absolute power of veto over it by the simple means of denying it its funding.
Making the local the deciding influence will make all politics much more responsive to peoples' wishes and aspirations.

I wasn't being serious. But a thick twat like you would never know.The self styled BenefitCheat-Finder General proposes giving everyone a straight £150 citizen wage.
Well fuck me Alright, you've had a sensible idea. Unfortunatly you qualified it with 'abolish all benefits'
Good luck to the single mother of four surviving on £150, and good luck to the disabled people funding their care with your £150. You total fucking loon, honestly you come in wielding the hammer on problems that require the scalpel.
... says a commieYeah it's hard to tell, what with your genuine opinions being a joke.

http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7146*sigh* the username is a direct reference to Eblen Moglen, the professor of Law at Columbia Uni. He wrote a manifesto calling for the abolition of intellectual property rights.


Giss a quick overview. Does he expect software writers to do it for nuffink?Oh the ironing.
The manifesto in it's written form is a good read, if a little to heavily couched in the language of the left.
Giss a quick overview. Does he expect software writers to do it for nuffink?

There's 2 things i've noticed about this thread-
1) nearly everyone who's answered could run the country better than the supposed professionals.
2) Not one of the smug twats who follow me round these forums nitpicking and bitching have managed to come on and say what THEY would do.
Thanks for letting me know - interesting.Yeah basically. He's involved with the free software people, linux and that. But thats not expecting a software person to do it for free. It's opposition to flogging his work over and over with very little profit to the original artist.
I don't completely agree. He talks about the modern 'consumer-class' that has come to supersede old notions of Patronage etc.
I have issue with total abolition of intellectual property rights, as I think an artist/writer/proggramer needs some defence against rapacious capital. But then I recall the clause from my Megabowl contract that gave them intellectual property rights over any work-based idea I might have.
Which encouraged me to not bother thinking on work time![]()
Rename the ministry of Defence into The Ministry of War
Got to name things according to what they do you know!
That's the downside of the idea. It depends on what there is in the individual ward. You'd have to make the wards roughly equal in terms of population, size etc. The point about groups of constituencies banding together to provide, for example a hospital is part of it. There's nothing to stop a wider area banding together, for example to provide a pipeline to supply water for a city or a route for a power cable. The point is that under this scheme, the rich city, if it wants its water or electricity, has to recognise the needs of the local wards. With the veto bit there is no riding roughshod over anybody.Wouldn't some areas with low incomes and not much industry come a cropper under a 100% local income tax plan? I can sort of see where you're coming from though.
epic doublethink fail