In Bloom said:Is it that you hate music, or just artistic genius in general?
Pearl Jam? Artistic genius?
that's the funniest thing i've read all week. You dolt

In Bloom said:Is it that you hate music, or just artistic genius in general?

In Bloom said:Is it that you hate music, or just artistic genius in general?
That's easy.Ninjaboy said:ok can we change it to 'what would it take to make you boycott glastonbury?'


Yossarian said:It's nothing in particular about the changes to Glastonbury that makes me think I might not bother going there again, it's been going to Sziget and deciding after that that I'd rather spend time trying out the different European festivals rather going to the same one here over and over again.
)Oi! What's wrong with Jethro Tull?Skim said:"Headlining acts: Jethro Tull

I could swear I had a conversation with you there last yearfree spirit said:missed last year

Very often., yes.In Bloom said:Do you ever post about anything you like on this forum?
Because I don't respond to aggressive insults from philistines. Grow up.In Bloom said:And if not, can you not just fuck off and take your whiney, elitist, sneering purism elsewhere?
No, I'm the one insisting that standards in art and aesthetics are to be taken seriously and not dispensed with for the sake of loudmouthery or populism. They don't belong to any particular field or genre: but the particular problem of pop music is that it insists on abusing them while at the same time expecting to be respected as if it did not.Orang Utan said:I think you're the one being a Philistine here, Donna

Donna Ferentes said:No, I'm the one insisting that standards in art and aesthetics are to be taken seriously and not dispensed with for the sake of loudmouthery or populism. They don't belong to any particular field or genre: but the particular problem of pop music is that it insists on abusing them while at the same time expecting to be respected as if it did not.
I wouldnt agree with that sweeping generalisation at all.Tom A said:Only been to Glasto in post-fence years (2002 and 2003). Enjoyed them both, and credit where credit is due, the fence kept out a lot of the undesirables who pilfered people's belongings from the tents
Donna Ferentes said:No, I'm the one insisting that standards in art and aesthetics are to be taken seriously and not dispensed with for the sake of loudmouthery or populism. They don't belong to any particular field or genre: but the particular problem of pop music is that it insists on abusing them while at the same time expecting to be respected as if it did not.
thefuse said:I wouldnt agree with that sweeping generalisation at all.
the majority of people who came in for free were alright i reckon.
putting that fence up killed the only atmosphere that was ever there.
pre fence it was all mad dogs and crusties, fuckin huge free parties going on for 3 days and loads more good drugs for sale.
everyone i spoke to over the last few years agrees that it feels boring now compared to when the convoy were there.
there were also a lot of very dangerous, machete wielding, balaclava wearing nutters around in those days who werent so much fun but it all added to the chaos (which i think is important at a festival)
This is so. Problem with pop music is, though, there's not just a lot more of this about, but there's also the have-it-both-ways argument I've referred to above, whereby critics (professional and amateur) both want to reject aforementioned standards and then declare genius anyway. Fair gets on my wick, and does nobody any good (except a number of the charlatans who mention, who make a great deal of money doing this).slowjoe said:err, I think you'll find that ALL disciplines and genres of creative expression are, and almost always have been knee-deep in charlatans (no oblique reference intended) claiming aesthetic or cultural significance and morons accepting and indeed trumpeting these claims.
exactlyNinjaboy said:then theres the whole mobile phone and cashcards thing. what happened to losing you friends, finding a packet of mushrooms and making a whole new group of friends, nowadays you'd just text them to meet you at a cafe after you qued for the cashpoint.....
nail on the head
dont get me started on thatthefuse said:exactlynail on the head
i've been ranting about this for the last few years.
i went to to the sunrise festival this year and had an old friend of mine calling and texting me every couple of hours to find out where i was.
people saying 'i'm by the big red tent' into their phones need killing imo.
and the cashpointdont get me started on that
The very kind of people I can happily do without thank you very much, I don't think that kind of person ever contribute anything to a festival. Do you reckon that people stand more chance of getting mugged just so there is some extra "chaos" at the festival? I'd rather have some comfort and security, any day, I have more of an issue with the fact it will around £130 a ticket next year, if not more.thefuse said:there were also a lot of very dangerous, machete wielding, balaclava wearing nutters around in those days who werent so much fun but it all added to the chaos (which i think is important at a festival)
Donna Ferentes said:This is so. Problem with pop music is, though, there's not just a lot more of this about, but there's also the have-it-both-ways argument I've referred to above, whereby critics (professional and amateur) both want to reject aforementioned standards and then declare genius anyway. Fair gets on my wick, and does nobody any good (except a number of the charlatans who mention, who make a great deal of money doing this).
Tom A said:The very kind of people I can happily do without thank you very much, I don't think that kind of person ever contribute anything to a festival. Do you reckon that people stand more chance of getting mugged just so there is some extra "chaos" at the festival? I'd rather have some comfort and security, any day, I have more of an issue with the fact it will around £130 a ticket next year, if not more.
I'm not sure what youy mean by "formal standards"slowjoe said:are you talking about the rejection of formal standards, and if so, why is this a bad thing?
The first part you rarely hear: the second part, though, you hear far too often. You'll say that this is so in other firleds - I'd agree, but less so.slowjoe said:or are you talking about the rejection of basic intellectual standards of, say, innovation/expression/'meaning', in which case when was the last time you heard a critic say 'this band are totally unoriginal and have nothing to say but they are geniuses nonetheless'?
Partly, yes. But what I'm trying to get over is that pop music tends to throw around epithets like "genius", "classic" and so on -slowjoe said:Is it not actually the case that pop music attracts more far-fetched claims of genius simply because of its, er, popularity
I'm sending this to Private EyeDonna Ferentes said:This, in turn, relates to what the actual difference is betwen pop music and classical music, somethig which is not well understood. Briefly, and generally, classical music is music with a formal education and pop music is music without one. This doesn't mean that one is good and that one is not, which would be a philistine claim and an ignorant one. But it does help explain why pop music is in some respects fearful of classical music, in the way that people who do not have an education in art are fearful of art. And a formal education is not entirely dispensible: there are things one can do and understand with a formal education that one cannot do without it. I think this matters. As it happens, it's a disadvantage which I think only genius can overcome.
I can fancy one all I like but I won't be getting one here.Orang Utan said:Does anyone fancy a pint?
You'll probably find they agree.Orang Utan said:I'm sending this to Private Eye