I thjink we have a divergence of class definitions in this country: on the one hand the classic marxist/economistic definition - whether you have ownership of the means of production distribution and exchange, or not - and on the other the cultural definition, which is the only one, by definition, which can make sense of the very term 'middle class'. culturally, the SWP are very middle class.
The fact is, as britain's economy - along with thatb of many other 'western' economies - mutates from bluecollar/smokestack/manufacturing economy to whitecollar/service economy, this divergence will grow. as you so rightly point out, call-centre slaves are as proletarian in terms opf their position in the scheme of things as the likes of James Connolly ever was!
I second this wholeheartedly. There are actually two different definitions on the go, and I think that this actually holds the movement back. Also, I don't think it's something confined to the UK. For example, in Japan, I think about 70% of the population described themselves as middle class in one survey.
It's only within the cultural context that it makes any sense to talk about there being a "middle class". I just think there is a cultural drift to the cultural "middle class" over time, eg: I often meet extended families where the younger members come across as "middle class" and the older members as more "working class".
Yeah completely agree with this. Although I must say I have experienced a fair bit of guilt tripping for showing any kind of overt consumerism or “bourgeois” tendency from other SWP members. Much of their definition of class (at least from a superficial perspective) seems to revolve around cultural politics. I work in a manufacturing facility and yet I get treated like some kind of elitist for choosing to spend my spare time at Tate modern or because I prefer continental beer to shitty mass market lager. I find this particularly stupid as the people I get this attitude most from are full time employees of the SWP who have never done a days work outside the party in their lives. It’s a pretty insular clique inside “the circle”.
That's bloody amazing. I didn't come across that sort of attitude myself that much during my days in the SWP, at least not amongst Leeds comrades, but I did come across one or two more isolated members in outlying areas who thought such things as it was "posh" to use a teapot, even though the person in question had private healthcare. Another comrade thought it was "posh" to drink wine. One non-SWP guy I knew stood for the Socialist Alliance when that was still going. After getting a reasonable sort of vote, his partner thought she would put on a cheese and wine party for him to celebrate, etc. But he was totally devastated, and said that he couldn't do that cos he was from Such-and-Such a town. Needless to say, I know people from the same town, and they love wine.
SWP apart, I've met a lot of socialists in the north of England who "hate people who talk posh", even when the people concerned are activists in anti-war, whatever. I think accentism such as this weakens the movement.
Think thats a bit hard on the Millies.
Maybe there aren't as many available young women in SP?
Or do you reckom SWP girls are easy!!!!!!
"Easy"?!!!!

ffs!! Which time machine have you just stepped out of? Or have we just timewarped back to the 1950's? You make it sound like any woman who fancies a good shag should be dragged through the streets in chains, or made to wear a scarlet letter.
Just for the record: my raunchy aside about the SWP having top tottie wasn't intended as sexist: I was referring to both men and women. In my case in partic, I was on about men. Anybody caring to read the post properly will have surmised correctly that my partner is male (hence "Mr Electric").