What are these alternatives of which you speak?
With windows there is another alternative, which is to change the shell/gui to something less demanding on resources. I believe you can also do a similar thing with osx albeit I have not tried it.
Dual, now get out of the forum.Why bother? Its not like duel/quad core chips are expensive and RAM is cheap as.

With windows there is another alternative, which is to change the shell/gui to something less demanding on resources. I believe you can also do a similar thing with osx albeit I have not tried it.

Why bother? Its not like duel/quad core chips are expensive and RAM is cheap as.

Why bother? Its not like duel/quad core chips are expensive and RAM is cheap as.
but incredibly easy to do with linux.![]()

Ancient history now, maybe true for obsolete hardware like a p4 box with sd ram and 4mb graphics![]()
Your missing the point, its the priorities of the kernal developers that is being put into question.
Yeah linux is great no doubt, I wouldn't want any other OS when its a box of the type that when it fails I get a call at 3am.
Its great at what it does being a rock solid server OS but I have no interest in using it as my daily work machine. Reading your post made me smile as it reminded me of seeing this cartoon a few days ago, enjoy.
![]()
actually my response was to stowpirates assertion that many of todays popular OSes are running a hell of amount of bloat. He said this included some of the more popular linux ditros. I just trying to point out that disabling alot of this bloat is very easy in say for example Ubuntu. In comparison to OSX or Windows.
FWIW I am writing this on a 1.42 Ghz PowerPC G4 Mac Mini with 512 MB RAM running OSX 10.4.11.
To be honest it runs like a piece of shit. It manages itunes and web browsing.
Or watching a video. Multi tasking is pointless as is video editing. It ran great when I got it, but bloat from apple on the OSX updates has rendered it virtually unusable.
actually my response was to stowpirates assertion that many of todays popular OSes are running a hell of amount of bloat. He said this included some of the more popular linux ditros. I just trying to point out that disabling alot of this bloat is very easy in say for example Ubuntu. In comparison to OSX or Windows.
FWIW I am writing this on a 1.42 Ghz PowerPC G4 Mac Mini with 512 MB RAM running OSX 10.4.11.
To be honest it runs like a piece of shit. It manages itunes and web browsing.
Or watching a video. Multi tasking is pointless as is video editing. It ran great when I got it, but bloat from apple on the OSX updates has rendered it virtually unusable.
there's no programs starting at boot on that system other than the OS and automatic update for this. It's just a relatively old system struggling to run the current OSX.
Is a less demanding version of linux a possible alternative?
I have no idea what is compatible with your machine but what about trying Mint Linux Gnome version or if you want something less demanding Xubuntu, Crunchbang or maybe even my favorite Browser Linux.
http://www.linuxmint.com/
http://www.xubuntu.org/
http://crunchbanglinux.org/
http://www.browserlinux.com/
Crunchbang appears to be popular at the moment
http://news.softpedia.com/news/First-look-CrunchBang-A-faster-Ubuntu-77535.shtml
All of the above are for standard i386 architecture. I believe there are versions of Ubuntu and Gentoo (amongst others, just cannot recall of the top of my head) that will work on a PowerPC architecture, however this will mean losing the support for my ipod touch and the apps store.
Alternatively my other option is to increase the RAM to 1GB, however my cackhandedness means that this is not an option for me - opening the Mac Mini looks like a task - so it looks like an expensive trip to the mac dealership is required.
That is just 1 of my systems at home however, the rest all run different flavours of linux.

All of the above are for standard i386 architecture. I believe there are versions of Ubuntu and Gentoo (amongst others, just cannot recall of the top of my head) that will work on a PowerPC architecture, however this will mean losing the support for my ipod touch and the apps store.
Alternatively my other option is to increase the RAM to 1GB, however my cackhandedness means that this is not an option for me - opening the Mac Mini looks like a task - so it looks like an expensive trip to the mac dealership is required.
That is just 1 of my systems at home however, the rest all run different flavours of linux.