Dillinger4
Es gibt Zeit
nothing exists
nothing is real
nothing can be proven
nothing can be known
nothing matters

nothing exists
nothing is real
nothing can be proven
nothing can be known
nothing matters

any philosopher offering any particular definition, may not be offering the correct definition, so how do they know what philosophy is?

but other philosophers have offered other definitions, there is no agreement
Why does there need to be a correct definition? There can be many.
![]()
to disagree, you need to have a common set of questions to disagree upon.
If not, you just have unrelated claims
there must be some capacity to define the questions on which we disagree, or we couldn't disagree!!!
nothing exists
nothing is real
nothing can be proven
nothing can be known
nothing matters
the only question is, what is philosophy? that is the question which people cannot agree on an answer to
I imagine that max probably isn't.
i love dictionaries
all the definitions are wrong
It's Ok, apparantly he doesn't really exist, so neither do his opinions on this thread.

I just thought I thought about epistemology. Could I?
if the dictionary is the final word on the question 'what is philosophy' then this whole thread is totally pointless, everyone is arguing over nothing, the OP should have just looked at a dictionary![]()

that depends on how you look at it
the only question is, what is philosophy? that is the question which people cannot agree on an answer to

[*]A system of values by which one lives: has an unusual philosophy of life

but there are limits to what "philosophy" might possibly be taken to mean - you accept that, right? It can't just mean whatever anyone wants it to mean - that is the Humpty Dumpty fallacy![]()
yes i agree with that but those limits might be impossible to find
Well, I'm looking at it from the point of view of information extrapolated from your posts, which suggest that your idea of what words mean and the dictionary definition are often quite different. Perhaps you need to look at it from a distance where you can actually read the words and don't need to make something up that sounds plausible.

not at all -
if someone posted on this thread to the effect that "philosophy" means that ratio of weight to height in giraffes, would we conclude
a) that the definitions of philosophy are indeed very diverse, or
b) that said poster hadn't got a clue what was meant by "philosophy"
if you answer 1, you can't really have a meaningful discussion with anyone about anything
Max, please point out any flaws in my definition.
are you saying that we can say what philosophy is not (ie it is not about giraffes)
but that we can't say what it is?
the fact that it's your definition
(it isnt the definition)
read the words from a distance?![]()
the fact that it's your definition
(it isnt the definition)
