Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

What is Art?

We seem to have diverted down an OT alley ....

Surely there is more to say about Art, what is and what isn't and the like ...

My dad used to paint, with a pallet knife, he built up his pictures layer on layer, they were almost three dimensional. They were impressions, not detailed, he didn't like detailed paintings, in fact he used to say, what is the point of them, why not just take a photo.
 
We seem to have diverted down an OT alley ....

Surely there is more to say about Art, what is and what isn't and the like ...

My dad used to paint, with a pallet knife, he built up his pictures layer on layer, they were almost three dimensional. They were impressions, not detailed, he didn't like detailed paintings, in fact he used to say, what is the point of them, why not just take a photo.
If you call a female artist a sexist derogatory term, expect to be pulled up on it.
 
If you call a female artist a sexist derogatory term, expect to be pulled up on it.
I certainly wasn't aware it was a sexist term, I was going to write "slob" but as I don't ever use that for a woman the other word came to mind. Sorry if you were offended, but the bed suggests untidiness, mess, disorder, uncleanness, etc etc .. as I think it was intended to.
 
I certainly wasn't aware it was a sexist term, I was going to write "slob" but as I don't ever use that for a woman the other word came to mind. Sorry if you were offended, but the bed suggests untidiness, mess, disorder, uncleanness, etc etc .. as I think it was intended to.
You'd have been better off with slob as it's not female specific :)
 
So, on earth, only humans do it?

Satin-Bower-Bird-Nest.jpg


The bowerbird creates art in order to attract mates. Are we so sure that isn't the origin of art in humans? Sexual selection? "Come up to my room to see my etchings!".

I've also seen an evolutionary explanation given for landscapes. The suggestion is, that a beautiful landscape often includes a meandering river, hills, a valley, flowers, trees, bio-diversity. In other words, a utopia for a hunter-forager. Lots of natural resources. Could that often be what attracts us?

Finally, how far back does human art go? Although we think that we see an explosion of expression in the cave art of Europe, dating as far back as 35,000 years ago or more, anthropologists keep finding earlier evidence of painting, maybe body painting, going back to maybe 80,000 years ago or more - predating any exodus of anatomically modern humans into Asia and Europe.

Then there's the Acheulian bi-face "hand axes" dating back to over one million years ago. Some of them are still clearly attractive, and asymmetrical beyond any practical requisite.

.... just a few thoughts from someone that doesn't understand art (but I know what I like!).
 
You'd have been better off with slob as it's not female specific :)
cesare, what is your understanding of the meaning of the word slattern?. google just says:

slattern
ˈslat(ə)n/
noun
dated
noun: slattern; plural noun: slatterns
  1. a dirty, untidy woman.
    "a slattern, her lipstick awry"
Which does not sound as derogatory as I think you feel?
 
cesare, what is your understanding of the meaning of the word slattern?. google just says:

slattern
ˈslat(ə)n/
noun
dated
noun: slattern; plural noun: slatterns
  1. a dirty, untidy woman.
    "a slattern, her lipstick awry"
Which does not sound as derogatory as I think you feel?
It's a gendered derogatory term. It's a gendered insult. It's offensive and there's no reason to call a female artist that because of a piece of her artwork.
 
It's a gendered derogatory term. It's a gendered insult. It's offensive and there's no reason to call a female artist that because of a piece of her artwork.

Is it more offensive to you because it is a female specific term?

It was intended to be light hearted, hence the smiley, obviously that did not work, but such a bed is a bit disgusting no? Can I not comment on that?
 
Is it more offensive to you because it is a female specific term?

It was intended to be light hearted, hence the smiley, obviously that did not work, but such a bed is a bit disgusting no? Can I not comment on that?
It's an insult designed and used specifically for females. It's sexist. Yes, it's more offensive to me because it's a fucking sexist insult. Comment on the artwork if you don't like it but don't call the artist sexist insults for producing it especially if you're fucking clueless as to what it actually represents.
 
It's an insult designed and used specifically for females. It's sexist. Yes, it's more offensive to me because it's a fucking sexist insult. Comment on the artwork if you don't like it but don't call the artist sexist insults for producing it especially if you're fucking clueless as to what it actually represents.
Ok...

As an artwork it doesn't do anything for me. I would want to put all the rubbish in the bin and change the sheets!

What does it represent for you?
 
.....
Two performance artists, Yuan Chai and Jian Jun Xi, jumped on the bed with bare torsos in order to improve the work, which they thought had not gone far enough. They called their performance Two Naked Men Jump into Tracey's Bed. The men also had a pillow fight[1] on the bed for around fifteen minutes, to applause from the crowd, before being removed by security guards. The artists were detained but no further action was taken.[2] Prior to its Tate Gallery showing, the work had appeared elsewhere, including Japan, where there were variant surroundings, including at one stage a hangman's noose hanging over the bed. This was not present when it was displayed at the Tate.[3]

My Bed
was bought by Charles Saatchi for £150,000 and displayed as part of the first exhibition when the Saatchi Gallery opened its new premises at County Hall, London (which it has now vacated). Saatchi also installed the bed in a dedicated room in his own home.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Bed
 
Satin-Bower-Bird-Nest.jpg


The bowerbird creates art in order to attract mates. Are we so sure that isn't the origin of art in humans? Sexual selection? "Come up to my room to see my etchings!".
Bower bird, good point, but is it art or something else? A nest is not art, is this not like a nest? I know it is intended to attract a mate but does that make it art?

I've also seen an evolutionary explanation given for landscapes. The suggestion is, that a beautiful landscape often includes a meandering river, hills, a valley, flowers, trees, bio-diversity. In other words, a utopia for a hunter-forager. Lots of natural resources. Could that often be what attracts us?
Hmm... ok, but are landscapes especially popular in art? I know they are "popular" .. I suppose they could be especially popular .. don't know ....

Finally, how far back does human art go? Although we think that we see an explosion of expression in the cave art of Europe, dating as far back as 35,000 years ago or more, anthropologists keep finding earlier evidence of painting, maybe body painting, going back to maybe 80,000 years ago or more - predating any exodus of anatomically modern humans into Asia and Europe.
Yes I think cave art goes way back, and body painting also ..

Then there's the Acheulian bi-face "hand axes" dating back to over one million years ago. Some of them are still clearly attractive, and asymmetrical beyond any practical requisite. ..
Never heard of them .. will google.
 
An interesting study would be if the bowerbird creates in patterns with little due course to limited instinctive patterns, and to compare that to human creativity. I must sound really boring. I had no introduction to art as a kid, except via a shitty education system - that being state based, should have been much better than it was. I think actually that in recent years, photography has made me much more aware about art than I've been ever in the past. Especially in popular art as expressed on the Internet by actual people, uploading their photo-art. Art is expression - with or without words. I'm saying that without any education or reading in the arts.

I have read too much (and practiced) about archaeology and prehistory. There is this question about "when did we become human". I think that it's fair enough to state, that we became cognitive modern humans when we started to express art. Because this was just another result of natural selection, it was very, gradual, and a very long process - extending over a million years. The thing that really marks our species is culture. We build our worlds around us, using imagination to change our environments to suit us. Not always very well, or with due course for the long term. I'm not kidding about the sexual selection. It may have been a factor in that selection. It got us laid.
 
A bower bird is doing something very specific, whether he knows it or not - he is trying to get laid.

Is he able to stand back from what he is doing and appreciate what it is?
 
A male bower bird certainly has an aesthetic sensibility - a feel for what looks right and what doesn't in order to create the overall effect he's after - and of course, the female has a sensibility too in choosing one bower over another.

That sensibility has certainly been developed over time through natural selection, and probably more of our aesthetic sense has also been shaped by evolution than most of us normally admit.

That allows the bower bird and us to create decorative pieces. But we have also developed something the bower bird probably has not - works that knowingly attempt to communicate to others some sense of our inner lives.
 
I'm not known for my flights of whimsy or particular dedication to artistry- a dabbler in poesy and short fic.

but, and dispute this if you will, I always saw the artist as the flawed lense, the human lense. And be it a painting, a poem, a story or a film. The thing captured is the thing seen through the eyes and emotions of the artist. It's not direct clinical photography or analytical history text. The art itself should tell you something of what the artist feels about what he is capturing in oils or words. Guernica is an obvious example.
 
Back
Top Bottom