Remember when Noel's House Party ruled the roost?
there is plenty wrong with it. It's utterly void of any meaning, any relevance, and only serves 1 purpose. To make some cunt in TV land some money. that's all it is, ever has been, and ever will be.
I remember it well, but it only ruled the roost, for boring cunts with no life. Who just sit there, dribbling into a packet of fucking doritos whilst they waste their life watching mindless TV shows.

Er... it's purpose is to entertain, thus generating decent ad sales and therefore revenue. It has to be entertaining to a lot of people to make the money.
You sound a bit like a try hard. A self-righteous one at that.

This thread 150 years ago:
'The vilest theatres are corrupting the morals of the land! The poor aren't cared for, the rich seek only to feather their own nests, and no one talks to anyone anymore!!'
There isn't a single complaint on here that hasn't been levelled against society generally by someone, usually a pious religious type who'd like to burn all non-bibles, in the last 500 years, probably 1,000. Complaints about the media; complaints about alienation of brother not caring for brother, complaints about apathy (not being fervent enough in your book burning?)...
I'm quite happy with western culture personally as there's something for everyone. If you want to watch mindless TV (which after a day spent working I quite enjoy doing) then that is there for you. If on the other hand you fancy a more 'intellectual' persuit then nothing is stopping you. The complaints about poverty and the like are more an issue of economics and politics rather than culture. For all his annoying tendencies I don't think Noel Edmunds can be held responsible for unemployment etc.
Folk have complained in the past?? No shit!
What's the problem then? Inequality, boredom, lethargy, the fuzz, crap on TV, the BBC?
![]()
Celebrity culture.
It's vacuous, period.

Young people and their lack of respect.
Huh? The extraordinary thing about those shows is the conspicuous lack of talent on show. Luckily anyone with anything about them doesn't give a shit what Simon Coward thinks about them, and would be worried, frankly, if he rated them. The reality tv talent shows produce a uniformly mediocre product. Poor saps who mistake not being tone deaf with talent are made to sing mediocre arrangements of mediocre songs mediocrely. And it's a huge deal when they're voted off for being slightly less than mediocre. Soft focus, tears, family members, cheesy music. It's faux-sincere shmaltz America-style. Yes, your only shot at fame is over. And why was it your only shot? Because you're mediocre, that's why. Because the closest to show-biz you are good enough to get is leading the sing-song with a karaoke machine that you drag around an ever-diminishing circle of pubs. And there's nothing wrong with doing that if it makes people happy, although people don't go to the pub to see you so much. Not when they can sit at home and watch you on tv with a fag in their hands.Well, no, it's not. You just don't like it, and seem to think this entitles you to look down on others who don't share your views.
There's is a whole raft of shit out there, no doubt, but Britain's Got Talent and the X-Factor is some of the best TV in years. Remember when Noel's House Party ruled the roost?
Huh? The extraordinary thing about those shows is the conspicuous lack of talent on show. Luckily anyone with anything about them doesn't give a shit what Simon Coward thinks about them, and would be worried, frankly, if he rated them. The reality tv talent shows produce a uniformly mediocre product. Poor saps who mistake not being tone deaf with talent are made to sing mediocre arrangements of mediocre songs mediocrely. And it's a huge deal when they're voted off for being slightly less than mediocre. Soft focus, tears, family members, cheesy music. It's faux-sincere shmaltz America-style. Yes, your only shot at fame is over. And why was it your only shot? Because you're mediocre, that's why. Because the closest to show-biz you are good enough to get is leading the sing-song with a karaoke machine that you drag around an ever-diminishing circle of pubs. And there's nothing wrong with doing that if it makes people happy, although people don't go to the pub to see you so much. Not when they can sit at home and watch you on tv with a fag in their hands.
Crap tv has always been around, and crap talent shows at that, and they've never once, in the decades they've been around, turned out a decent artist.
Maybe. I think that all culture is not of equal value, then yes, I probably do sound superior. Good. I also distinguish between artists and singers. Many of those on your list are singers, not artists. I haven't heard of the other ones. For a singer to qualify as an artist, they need to bring new depth to an interpretation from within themselves. Billie Holliday was an artist. Will Young is not. Or if he is, then so am I as I can also hold a tune and put some emotion into my singing.You sound more than a bit superior.
Maybe. I think that all culture is not of equal value, then yes, I probably do sound superior. Good. I also distinguish between artists and singers. Many of those on your list are singers, not artists. I haven't heard of the other ones. For a singer to qualify as an artist, they need to bring new depth to an interpretation from within themselves. Billie Holliday was an artist. Will Young is not. Or if he is, then so am I as I can also hold a tune and put some emotion into my singing.
I use the word artist more sparingly. An artist does something new, shows a new angle to the world, provides an example that can be reinterpreted by others. I don't see any in your list that does that, although I admit that it is a subjective judgement.
Culture might not be of equal value, but that doesn't mean that the lower end of scale has NO value.
Besides, cultural value is subjective. What means a lot to you, doesn't necessarily mean a lot to a Leona Lewis fans, but their enjoyment of Leona Lewis' 'music' might equal your enjoyment of the things you see as superior.
What makes you right and then wrong?
Young people and their lack of respect.

When they could be watching Spurs play or listening to acid techno in a disused office block?![]()

What's the problem then? Inequality, boredom, lethargy, the fuzz, crap on TV, the BBC?
![]()
Oh, it's not so bad. Celebrity culture is a fucking arse ache, and people can get away with being incredibly selfish without rebuke, but hey. In the grand scheme of things, it's all pretty fucking sweet.
Inhospitality. That's the main problem. People don't talk to their neighbours, they are apathetic and alienated.
It's a shame really as in many ways I love Britain


Yeah I'm mostly thinking in comparison with China. Which is perhaps unfair.


