kained&able
Here for the football.
pah misery. When i wnt down t'mines that was misery. Your not miserable you navel gazing bastard!
dave

dave

pah misery. When i wnt down t'mines that was misery. Your not miserable you navel gazing bastard!
dave

I don't know where to start. Read up on what he did to Bily Bonds and then see if you still think it's simply part of the modern game. It's not, he has little decency, stitching up his (now ex) mate and the bloke who first gave him a job at West Ham.
The bloke's a moral vacuum, perhaps a good man-manager with a certain type of player but fucking disasterous with others - Dumitrescu, Raducioiu, Boogers (fucking hell, Boogers) all failed under Redknapp and failed big time. That had fuck-all to do with learning the job, it's all to do with open decent interaction with people, and that's one of many areas he fails completely.
Spends shedloads of cash but maintains he's always wheeling and dealing on shoe string, revisionist on every aspect of his career - still thinks he did a great job at West Ham despite inheriting and selling the family jewels (not that he'd give anyone involved in scouting, coaching and developing these young lads any credit, no it was all Harry) - bungs, less-than-transparent deals. That's why he was sacked from West Ham - Paul Alridge: 'you've stitched me up for the last time' - but of course that's not how bungpuss portrays it.
The bloke's a twat. Really.
our fans are all either white-van driving burberry wearing nouveau riche, dodgy nutters, or eccentrics; .
Billy Bonds was getting nowhere as a manager (Where is he now as a manager? Great player but not cut out for management was he?) Redknapp was an average player who has made a good manager was ambitious the situation with Bonds was all inevitable friendship or not.
Under Redknapp West Ham enjoyed their most successful period in the Premiership.
Under Redknapp Portsmouth finally returned to the big time and have silverware.
Someone offers £23 million for Rio Ferdinand - Do you really think that was Redknapps decision alone to accept the offer? In fact if you think about it the crazy transfer market had its pivotal moment then West Ham had no choice but to accept that crazy offer from Leeds, they are a business first.
Redknapps first loyalties lie with himself and his family as all of our own loyalties do, that is generally human nature, I find it amusing that football fans cannot see this at times it may be ugly, but it's life.
Also regards his transfer dealings you might find that whilst Redknapp made some bad choices (What manager hasn't and as I said he may have found that a learning curve) at least none of his transactions have threatened to relegate West Ham in the way the Tevez transaction might and one specifically Paul Aldridge played his part in screwing up on and further on you can then look at some of the transfer dealings under Curbishleys reign a bunch of crocks - hardly enlightened purchases with a good financial outcome were they?
Redknapp appears to have good interaction with players and getting results from them - for the three that you mention there are plenty of success stories if not at West Ham elsewhere.
I feel People get too emotional to put all this into clear perspective and examine the facts.
And finally he might be a twat, but do you know what? he is successful, most players like him, most of the press like him... it's mainly jilted fans and jilted Club Chairmen that despise him.
hi jamie! how's louise?
This is why he'll fail at Spuds and blame it on their rather stupendously silly exec set up.
They got rid of that silly exec set up, just after we copied it.

I met Tony Mowbray once and he is an out-and-out good guy. Frankly, the personal tragedy that he has endured in his life seems to have given him a proper perspective on the game. And he always seemed like a nice bloke in the first place. I'd happily have him mind my seat, so to speak.


