Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

what are the main differnces between France and England

RenegadeDog said:
He wasn't, he's just drumming up typical blind North American prejudice against the UK.

So, did I just dream that visit? And I can still taste that rubber food in the automated restaurant near Lancaster Gate!

The imagination is a powerful thing.

My wife was there a few months ago. She still can't look a piece of mortadella in the eye.
 
There are plenty of good restaurants in London all across the price range. Central London can be a bit crap though. It's a common tourist mistake to try the overpriced and really poor restaurants there and think they are representative.

Believe me, in reality North Americans don't have any better taste in food than Britons, and sometimes a lot worse - hence my mashed potato powder example.

Still, play on your prejudices all you like. Judge britain from your cliched 50s comic book if you want.
 
I should add that central Paris is also full of woeful touristy restaurants, especially all the cod-greek areas around the 'latin quarter' which serve really decidedly mediocre food.

Actually I found living in Paris a decidedly average eating experience on the whole, definitely not what it is cracked up to be.
 
Johnny Canuck2 said:
Apart from passing through the airport, it's been awhile.

The diversity of food availible in the UK knocks the socks off France.

Jus take a wander around Paris and see how many foreign food restaurants they have, not many. Whereas I'd say more than 90% of English ones are 'foreign'.

Their indigenous food may be better but society is not made up of just indigenous people, whoever they are.
 
DrRingDing said:
The diversity of food availible in the UK knocks the socks off France.

Jus take a wander around Paris and see how many foreign food restaurants they have, not many. Whereas I'd say more than 90% of English ones are 'foreign'.

Their indigenous food may be better but society is not made up of just indigenous people, whoever they are.

Exactly, and the Balti was invented in birmingham anyway. ALso if we only judged Canada and the US on 'indiginous' food, we'd have to look exclusively at traditional native american food...
 
RenegadeDog said:
There are plenty of good restaurants in London all across the price range. Central London can be a bit crap though. It's a common tourist mistake to try the overpriced and really poor restaurants there and think they are representative.

Believe me, in reality North Americans don't have any better taste in food than Britons, and sometimes a lot worse - hence my mashed potato powder example.

Still, play on your prejudices all you like. Judge britain from your cliched 50s comic book if you want.

I can't find that Rupert comic anywhere.

This is a thread comparing England and France; my reply rose or sank to the level of the thread topic.
 
RenegadeDog said:
I should add that central Paris is also full of woeful touristy restaurants, especially all the cod-greek areas around the 'latin quarter' which serve really decidedly mediocre food.

Actually I found living in Paris a decidedly average eating experience on the whole, definitely not what it is cracked up to be.

You mean rue de la harpe, rue de la hachette.

Nobody actually eats in Botulism Alley.

Delude yourself all you want into thinking that London is the culinary equivalent of Paris.
 
DrRingDing said:
The diversity of food availible in the UK knocks the socks off France.

Jus take a wander around Paris and see how many foreign food restaurants they have, not many. Whereas I'd say more than 90% of English ones are 'foreign'.

Their indigenous food may be better but society is not made up of just indigenous people, whoever they are.

It's a good thing you have all those curry houses, because the indigenous food is crap.

Paris is a gustatory delight, from the food served off carts in the streets of the left bank, to the patisseries, to the good restaurants. All washed down with good, cheap wine.
 
RenegadeDog said:
Exactly, and the Balti was invented in birmingham anyway. ALso if we only judged Canada and the US on 'indiginous' food, we'd have to look exclusively at traditional native american food...

I'd rather eat smoked salmon than tripe and boiled dinner.
 
Johnny Canuck2 said:
It's a good thing you have all those curry houses, because the indigenous food is crap.

For one, the curry houses are part of the cuisine in britain. The balti was invented in birmingham.

If we aren't going to count the curry houses, we would have to discount everything in north america other than native american cuisine, famous as that is.

And even if you discount supposed 'foreign' food, there is nothing more delicious than a proper English sunday roast.
 
Similarily Tikka Massala is a Scottish invention. I don't think we do discount foreign food though do we? It's all part of our lives.
If we're going to start rating food by it's origins then we'll all back to very simple menus which haven't been used for centuries. Much as I like boar and venison that historically accurate bill of fayre has past into history, far more a minority taste than Indian, Chinese or Thai...
 
We have to look at the quality of food served in London today, regardless of its origins, IMO, and its mostly a much better quality than people like Johnny Cannuck, who appears to get his definitions from a Lonely Planet guide, seem to think.
 
RenegadeDog said:
We have to look at the quality of food served in London today, regardless of its origins, IMO, and its mostly a much better quality than people like Johnny Cannuck, who appears to get his definitions from a Lonely Planet guide, seem to think.

Londond has AMAZING food to offer that is if you can afford it!!! one thing i noticed over here is that you get very good quality food for little money - it's just something the french take as a given....
 
Vast numbers of French come over here to work due to the flexibility of the British job market apparently - jobs are fairly hard to come by over in France for the young in particular - and are apparently not that well paid (though pretty secure once in)

French train drivers can retire at 50 on half pay ! - in the UK a good number of new drivers are over 50 !

Books tend to be a bit dearer and not such a wide choice available.

Vive la difference !
 
fra:cool: nce has a better football team,
the french chopped their monarchy heads off,
bresse chickens are better than sainsbury
they make chocolate in laboratories rather than factories
although english cheese is easily as good as french
french beef is shite
french lamb is shite
 
Having lived in France for four years I can definitely say that they have a far superiour health care system compared to the NHS.
 
perplexis said:
But far worse racism and general irritating rustic parochialism. Pretty conservative.
Conservative in some ways but they've never elected a Thatcher. There would be war. They like a proper ruck with the cops. Even the firemen, whose fire engines are much smaller.

Firemen13.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom