OK I'm goin to respond once and that's itso it should. It's just a shame it was so badly drafted that cleverly written contracts can bypass it without affecting the fundamentals of the arrangement. Howeever, there is some hope that simply writing in clauses about MOO or substitution is being seen for what it is.
Cleverly written contracts can be set aside by the revenue because the important thing is "the substance" of what's going on not nec the written wording
I agree, there are some cases where people have been able to use the wording in a contract to avoid IR35 but there is far more to it than just that. It is similar to deciding if someone is genuinely self employed or not. There are a series of tests - in self employment it would be the "7 badges of trade" and you make it sound so easy.... as I said - where I work there is a very high proportion of contractors and I can assure you that most are caught by IR35!
Right that's it from me - from now on back on topic

