Monkeynuts said:
So what? What is this link supposed to prove other than to confirm exactly what I've been saying all along, and to further undermine your own argument? Pre-1965, what you're claiming now would, I agree, have been the facts. But that was, like, 41 YEARS ago. The boundaries have CHANGED. Get over it!
I'm not concerned with postal districts. If the Post Office decides that a CR0 postcode belongs to 'Croydon, Surrey' that's their own convoluted prerogative (probably a lot to blame for the confusion) and is strategic, depending on feasable population coverage by one postal town. However, I'm talking geographical boundaries here. Find me an atlas of the UK printed since fucking Beatlemania and show me where Middlesex is. And show me the boundary of Surrey and where Croydon is in that. You can't? Didn't think so.
Boundaries are boundaries. Borders are borders. How the fuck can they overlap? It's against their very nature! Listen up:
SURREY IS SURREY.
GUILDFORD IS IN SURREY.
KENT IS KENT.
TUNBRIDGE WELLS IS IN KENT.
GREATER LONDON IS GREATER LONDON.
CROYDON IS IN GREATER LONDON.
BROMLEY IS IN GREATER LONDON.
MIDDLESEX DOESN'T EXIST.
FACT. LIVE WITH IT.
And now, back to West Norwood.
