I think many will admire him for taking the flak,getting his point across and making some good points.....And i think BNP membership will go up...
You think ? or you hope ?

I think many will admire him for taking the flak,getting his point across and making some good points.....And i think BNP membership will go up...

and for staring with one mad eye? it's like the final of masterchef, only it's called masterfash instead innit....I think many will admire him for taking the flak,getting his point across and making some good points.....And i think BNP membership will go up...
You think ? or you hope ?![]()

Go on, list the good points he made then...
one by one
Don't be a clown, there are plenty of people out there who think they have a point with some of their policies, but generally think they are w-.
After tonight they'll be even less sure of the BNP, or speaking up for them out of pure national primetime ridicule.![]()
I'll take it that you can't then.![]()
Hain's attempt to restart his career (again) backfires (again). Couldn't happen to a nicer fellar.In a letter to Mark Thompson, the BBC Director-General, Mr Hain wrote: “Now that the BNP have accepted they are at present an unlawful body, it would be perverse of you to maintain that they are just like any other democratically-elected party.
“If you do not review the decision you may run the very serious risk of legal challenge in addition to the moral objections that I make. In my view, your approach is unreasonable, irrational and unlawful.”
A media lawyer who wished to remain anonymous claimed that Mr Hain had made two unfounded leaps of faith. Firstly, by suggesting that the BNP was in any way an illegal party and secondly by suggesting that the BBC would be prevented from inviting them on even if the party was in some way unlawful.
“It’s complete nonsense,” he said. “I think it’s pretty shocking that a Minister of State would make such an assertion.”
Yeah you being right bloody clever probably will......
that's a nice coherent argument you've put acrossYou're almost as shit at putting your point across as that one-eyed nutjob you're in love with.
They're not idiots, but they are freedom oppressing, and a protest designed to silence Mr Griffin was never going to be peaceful. That was a mob outside the BBC, and I don't want that bunch of self-appointed enforcers deciding who's allowed to speak and who isn't. UAF quote Mr Griffin on their website: "When the crunch comes, power is the product of force and will, not of rational debate." Looks like they've taken that odious man's odious view to heart.The only certainty is that UAF scored another spectacular own goal by having a nothing like peaceful enough protest which succeeded in making themselves look like the freedom oppressing idiots, and detracting from Griffin's mess.
that's a nice coherent argument you've put across
I think many will admire him for taking the flak,getting his point across and making some good points.....And i think BNP membership will go up...
So what clear point did he make? What did he say that people could home in on?
He didn't actually say very much.
Sadly, this sums it up. Mr Griffin was expecting a verbal kicking and took it well, although the mob hoping for a literal version was disappointed. For now. I knew how repellent Mr Griffin was, but it's the images of the masked, flare-waving mob that'll stay with me. Goodness help us when the new wave of speech police get into the halls of power.The programme was essentially a BNP special edition.
Various people asked Mr Griffin to explain his policies and positions in more detail, which he did in fairly predictable terms. Equally predictably those positions were discussed from fairly conventional viewpoints.
While Mr Griffin didn't come across as a particularly powerful speaker nor a sympathetic character there were no real surprises, no hard punches landed on either side. The overall impression given was simply that the BNP had arrived and their views now form part of the national debate.
The programme was essentially a BNP special edition.
Various people asked Mr Griffin to explain his policies and positions in more detail, which he did in fairly predictable terms. Equally predictably those positions were discussed from fairly conventional viewpoints.
While Mr Griffin didn't come across as a particularly powerful speaker nor a sympathetic character there were no real surprises, no hard punches landed on either side. The overall impression given was simply that the BNP had arrived and their views now form part of the national debate.
Aside from anything, he looked a right cunt for giving it the 'my dad served and yours didn't' shite
No, well, you wouldn't, would you.I saw nothing whatsoever in the programme that would deter anyone sympathetic to the BNP's views from voting for them.
No, well, you wouldn't, would you.
At least, not in your persona on here.
Nah - that was the only fucking point he completely scored.
I thought it came off as total crass ner-ner bollocks tbf
who gives a fuck about whose dad did what. He scored on the war dead attack. The dad stuff was playground