Maybe you just don't like comics. It's nothing to be ashamed of.Maybe I have not been reading the right ones then.
If any of those others are shit too well then i'll i'll i'll. . . .
I am also reading swamp thing for the first time and getting a bit bored.
Like making the president shit himself prolapsed.Ellis constantly tries and make Spider seem more badass by mentioning reprehensible things he's done off screen.
Maybe you just don't like comics. It's nothing to be ashamed of.
<shrugs>
GS(v)
Like making the president shit himself prolapsed.
Or beating someone up with the Chair Leg Of Truth.
Or killing various hit-men.
Or killing his ex-wife's head.
GS(v)
let's be honest here, referencing early Dredd scuppers you. Because crucially early Dredd was shite and Transmet isn't.
Your arguement has had a go on the waltzers and span off in a mad direction.
Transmet wins because it's riffing on fear n loathing. Freak angels wins because it riffs on John Wyhndam.
Both are great pieces of pastiche, and (this bit is important) Ellis had some fucking excellent artists to work with in both cases.
It riffs on. But missing the point so badly that it lands on a different continent .
Thats a fucking daft argument Chris Bachalo did amazing work on Shade the changing man, and brilliant work on the first issues of Generation X for the X men. But fucking hell generation X was a piece of shit and Shade was freaking awesome.
Transmet is fucking dire because of the writing, I've noticed you've not addressed in any real sense my issues why I loath the piece of shit. It's unoriginal, hackneyed, derivative crap.
He's not meant to be evil. If you think he's not sufficiently vile and unpleasant on the page, then you're extremely fucking jaded. You're also probably misunderstanding the character.All of which of are acts of violence committed against people who fucking deserve it. My point is that the really reprehensible shit spider is supposed to have engaged in happens off screen.
Killing hit men isn't exactly something anyone is going to horrified by. No one lost points humiliating a US president. And we're constantly told what a collection of evil hags his Ex Wives are. Oh gosh man fucks with his evil ex wife. Ho Ho fucking ho he's a scamp!. When it comes to the truly evil shit SJ has engaged in, it all happens behind the scenes.
Its fucking weak as diabetic piss.
He's not meant to be evil. If you think he's not sufficiently vile and unpleasant on the page, then you're extremely fucking jaded. You're also probably misunderstanding the character.
GS(v)
Like making the president shit himself prolapsed.
Or beating someone up with the Chair Leg Of Truth.
Or killing various hit-men.
Or killing his ex-wife's head.
Oh hang on - these things all happen on-screen.
Sounds like you just can't handle that he's what we call in the English language call a complex and interesting character.
GS(v)
He's not meant to be amoral at all though is he.
He kills people and starts riots.
that isn't indicative of an absence of any moral code. Unorthodoxy morality perhaps.
No he's not. He's an egotistical, selfish, rude and violent cunt. He also cares profoundly about people, particularly those getting kicked hardest by industry and politicians, but despises their stupidity.He's meant to be amoral. But Warren Ellis is too much of a fucking hack to even try to attempt and portray that.
No he's not. He's an egotistical, selfish, rude and violent cunt. He also cares profoundly about people, particularly those getting kicked hardest by industry and politicians, but despises their stupidity.
If you think he's meant to be amoral, you really have missed the point.
GS(v)
Yeh and? Last post, he wasn't unpleasant enough for your tastes.He's also supposed to be violent and indifferent to his many PAs. Classy.
He's also supposed to be violent and indifferent to his many PAs. Classy.
Yeh and? Last post, he wasn't unpleasant enough for your tastes.
GS(v)
Incoherent argument is incoherent.