Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Walking the path of the River Effra... Sunday 27th September

Which date then?


  • Total voters
    17
I woner if the crypt at west norwood has bodies in it.....

Assuming you mean the church rather than the South Metropolitan Cemetery...

The parish register records everyone buried at St Luke’s, the first burial being on 3 October 1825 and the final one on 7 September 1894. The majority were interred in the churchyard. However, some coffins were deposited in a crypt beneath the church building itself and are now stacked behind a wall at the southern end of that area. The churchyard has been legally closed, so no further burials may take place there apart from cremated remains

http://www.stlukes4u.org/burials.htm - it is an impressive effort by a local church congregation to provide burial records for family history researchers on the web.
 
Photos taken by the boyfriend finally:http://www.flickr.com/photos/boohooroo/sets/72157622545565679/

the box, the box. What was in the box??:D

4015528048_a7b422de7f.jpg


4014798527_ce768a01be.jpg


4015573608_018bb4990e.jpg


4014820001_6beb030cef.jpg
 
For those of you that came on the effra walk, i'm sad to say the lovely little house which probably sat once on the banks of the river has been pulled down...:(
4015411720_91594e876b.jpg
 
Shit :( That could have been a lovely home for someone :(

i knew the people who use to live there so i had visited the house once. I'd been told it had had an air raid shelter in the back. It was a wonderful example of that type of little house.

I was gutted it was gone because i wondered if it could have been protected due to age and location - however, stuck down a little back street no-one was going to miss it.
 
It was a bit banjacksed though - like the site of a very long, very good party. Which it may well have been, more than once.

Will another house go in its place, do you know?
 
Well, it looked like someone had started developing it when we visited because originally you would have entered in the front door with a view of straight up the stairs or entrances to rooms on either side of the door. There was two rooms upstair and I think a small bathroom upstairs. So realistically the original main house was two rooms downstairs and two rooms with a smaller room. At the back had been created a toilet and kitchen. So it really was a tiny cottage.

I imagine the last owners had ran out of cash hence the damage to the building and half finished renovations. A new build will go up but that can't really replace a 1850s small cottage.
 
They have cleared used the whole plot including the front garden so it is a big enough space for a larger building.

It is certainly big enough for a block of flats - can't remember the exact number of dwellings, but it is certainly going to be taller.

The size of the cleared site as it currently appears may be deceiving though. Over the winter the builders were excavating part of the bank behind the old building when it caused a landslip and swallowed a chunk of the gardens in the next street. This was exacerbated by the bad weather and works have been delayed due to a number of other reasons since then.
 
How sad - it was a remarkable little survivor. It was inevitable I suppose - completely surrounded by bigger and newer developments. I am surprised it wasn't listed though.
 
Back
Top Bottom